“…Researchers have studied the characteristics of fractured surfaces using observational tools, from macro- to nanoscale [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Unfortunately, even though advanced methods such as optical coherence tomography [ 18 ], scanning acoustic microscopy [ 19 ] or energy response approach based on strain energy density histories during variable loading [ 20 , 21 ] are described in the literature, usually simple-fracture qualitative analysis conducted with scanning electron microscopy is employed for the evaluation of surface fractures resulting from impact [ 22 , 23 ], tensile strength [ 24 , 25 ], fatigue [ 5 , 19 ], ultra-high fatigue [ 26 ], adhesion testing [ 27 ] or even wear damage description [ 28 , 29 ]. However, few studies have investigated the use of profile and surface roughness as a tool for fatigue fracture characterisation.…”