2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Silica Particle Size on Macrophage Inflammatory Responses

Abstract: Amorphous silica particles, such as nanoparticles (<100 nm diameter particles), are used in a wide variety of products, including pharmaceuticals, paints, cosmetics, and food. Nevertheless, the immunotoxicity of these particles and the relationship between silica particle size and pro-inflammatory activity are not fully understood. In this study, we addressed the relationship between the size of amorphous silica (particle dose, diameter, number, and surface area) and the inflammatory activity (macrophage phago… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

13
199
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
199
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 SiNPs accumulation in lysosomes has been suggested as a mechanism of cytotoxicity in lung epithelial cells, and its overload leading to delayed clearance and particle persistence can negatively impact lysosome function. 59 It has been reported that internalized SiNPs could cause destabilization of lysosomes and permeabilization of lysosome membranes, 60 resulting in ROS generation, cytosolic acidification, and eventually cellular death. 61,62 Additionally, lysosome is vulnerable to ROS generated by NPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58 SiNPs accumulation in lysosomes has been suggested as a mechanism of cytotoxicity in lung epithelial cells, and its overload leading to delayed clearance and particle persistence can negatively impact lysosome function. 59 It has been reported that internalized SiNPs could cause destabilization of lysosomes and permeabilization of lysosome membranes, 60 resulting in ROS generation, cytosolic acidification, and eventually cellular death. 61,62 Additionally, lysosome is vulnerable to ROS generated by NPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 In their study, they noted that the smaller NPs (30-1,000 nm) induced a greater inflammatory response than the larger NPs. Our study also shows a similar result, with only the 10 nm silica NP showing any difference in cytokine production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…22 Inflammatory responses presenting as elevated interleukin-1β were elicited more by smaller particles when different size, dose, concentration, and surface area mixtures of SiNPs were internalized by mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages. 23 Sohaebuddin et al 24 reported that SiO 2 nanoparticles of 30 nm diameter induced apoptosis of the cocultured cells with increasing percentages in 3T3 fibroblasts, human bronchiolar epithelial cells, and RAW macrophages, reaching ~10%, 50%, and 90%, respectively; however, little necrosis was observed in these studied cells. In contrast, limited cytotoxicity, measured as global metabolism activity, was seen when human epithelial intestinal HT-29 cells were exposed to both 25 and 100 nm nano-SiO 2 particles for 24 hours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pulmonary inflammation was detected by microcomputed tomography in mice lungs after intratracheal injection with the SiNPs of 30 or 3,000 nm, and smaller particles caused more severe complications. 23 Many studies demonstrated that most porous SiNPs deposited in liver and spleen when administered via blood and most of them were cleared in ,1 month. 28,29 Delayed clearance was noted when nonporous amorphous SiNPs were given intravenously to mice, and elevated aminotransferases, increased inflammatory cytokines, and hepatocytic necrosis were also found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%