2016
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of taxol on the expression of FoxM1 ovarian cancer-associated gene

Abstract: The incidence of ovarian cancer in women has been on the increase in recent years. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of taxol on the expression of ovarian cancer-associated gene forkhead box transcription factor M1 (FoxM1) and its therapeutic effects for ovarian cancer. The expression of FoxM1 gene was examined in patients with or without ovarian cancer. RNA and protein levels of FoxM1 gene of ovarian cancer patients were detected at different time periods (1, 3, 6, 8, 12 and 24 months) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also disrupts the cytoskeletal framework that is necessary for tumor cell replication and metastatic spread (Magidson et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2018), and this disruption subsequently triggers cancer cell death not only in mitotic arrest state, but also after mitotic slippage to an abnormal G1 (Zhu et al, 2014). Taxol has been commonly prescribed to treat a variety of tumors, particularly ovarian and breast cancer (Reichman et al, 1993; Kampan et al, 2015; Notte et al, 2015; Bo et al, 2016; Liu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also disrupts the cytoskeletal framework that is necessary for tumor cell replication and metastatic spread (Magidson et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2018), and this disruption subsequently triggers cancer cell death not only in mitotic arrest state, but also after mitotic slippage to an abnormal G1 (Zhu et al, 2014). Taxol has been commonly prescribed to treat a variety of tumors, particularly ovarian and breast cancer (Reichman et al, 1993; Kampan et al, 2015; Notte et al, 2015; Bo et al, 2016; Liu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%