1941
DOI: 10.2307/1231850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Tenure Systems on Agricultural Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since before Marshall (1920), some agricultural economists have presumed the inefficiency of share contracts over fixed wage and fixed rent contracts in agriculture. Schickele (1941) and Heady (1947) had the view that share contracts are inefficient but Heady mentioned that cost sharing could lead to Pareto optimality. D. Gale Johnson (1950) looked at more general equilibrium considerations, concluding that these "make crop-share tenancy function reasonably well.…”
Section: Contribution #10: Assessing the Role Of Crop Insurance And Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since before Marshall (1920), some agricultural economists have presumed the inefficiency of share contracts over fixed wage and fixed rent contracts in agriculture. Schickele (1941) and Heady (1947) had the view that share contracts are inefficient but Heady mentioned that cost sharing could lead to Pareto optimality. D. Gale Johnson (1950) looked at more general equilibrium considerations, concluding that these "make crop-share tenancy function reasonably well.…”
Section: Contribution #10: Assessing the Role Of Crop Insurance And Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following A. Smith, all the economists until G. Johnson (1950) have considered sharecropping as a "practice which is hurtful to the whole society," an unexplained failure of the invisible hand that should be either discouraged by taxation (A. Smith) or slightly improved by appropriate sharing of variable factors (Schickele (1941) and Heady (1947)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the amount of research on precise relationships between occupancy and environmental outcomes has been limited (Winter, 2007), there is a long history of observations of relationships between tenancy and agricultural economic performance (Higgs, 1972;Hill and Gasson 1985;Schickele, 1941). Occupancy arrangements may influence the level of investment in pollution mitigation technologies with owners or secure tenants more likely to be able to invest (c.f.…”
Section: Private Jurisdictions: the Farmer Still Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%