2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the promoter presence in catalysts on the compositions of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical treatments have been proposed in order to generate favorable mesoporosity of zeolite supports, for example, solvent-free in situ synthesis, 115 sequential dealuminization− desilication, 108 alkaline treatment, 82,113,116 soft template, 82 steam-assisted crystallization, 114 and delamination. 117 All of these methods were reported to result in an increase in CO conversion and selectivity toward hydrocarbons in the liquid range at the expense of CH 4 selectivity. Mesopores promote enhanced accessibility of the acid sites when compared with microporous zeolites.…”
Section: Bifunctional Catalysts For the One-stagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical treatments have been proposed in order to generate favorable mesoporosity of zeolite supports, for example, solvent-free in situ synthesis, 115 sequential dealuminization− desilication, 108 alkaline treatment, 82,113,116 soft template, 82 steam-assisted crystallization, 114 and delamination. 117 All of these methods were reported to result in an increase in CO conversion and selectivity toward hydrocarbons in the liquid range at the expense of CH 4 selectivity. Mesopores promote enhanced accessibility of the acid sites when compared with microporous zeolites.…”
Section: Bifunctional Catalysts For the One-stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesopores promote enhanced accessibility of the acid sites when compared with microporous zeolites. 117 The mesopore size has a significant effect on the FT process performance. Peng et al 107 reported that a mesopore size of around 15 nm favors selectivity toward hydrocarbons in the diesel range (∼60%) and decreases selectivity in the gasoline range and for CH 4 (∼5%).…”
Section: Bifunctional Catalysts For the One-stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dry reforming of methane (DRM) has been regarded as a process to produce syngas (CO and H 2 ), while providing a prospective solution for mitigation of greenhouse gases (CH 4 and CO 2 ). The produced syngas is a valuable precursor for many other downstream applications [1,2]. It can be used directly as fuel or converted to other hydrocarbons to produce valuable ultra-clean fuels and products such as methanol, diesel, gasoline, kerosene and naphtha via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, and other reactions [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these advantages are: the higher activity by weight of the metal, higher resistance to water deactivation, and the lower production of oxygenates. To improve the performance of these catalysts, the "promoters" are generally used (Mangaloğlu et al, 2018;Rodrigues et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, SBA-15 also has thicker pore walls and better hydrothermal stability than MCM-41. These features can be relevant for the FTS process because water is a by-product of the reaction (Mangaloğlu et al, 2018;Phaahlamohlaka et al, 2018;Rodrigues et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%