2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of transcranial static magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in the contralateral primary motor cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, the MEPs decreased in the right hand and increased in the left hand after tSMS, suggesting that the suppression of the cortical excitability in the unilateral hemisphere can induce the facilitation of the excitability in the contralateral hemisphere. Since a previous study reported that the MEP amplitude was not facilitated after tSMS of 20-min duration over the contralateral M1 25 , this transient facilitation effect in the contralateral hemisphere after 30-min intervention is a novel finding of this study. However, compared to the suppression effect directly induced by tSMS, the facilitation effect of contralateral M1 was only shown just after tSMS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Namely, the MEPs decreased in the right hand and increased in the left hand after tSMS, suggesting that the suppression of the cortical excitability in the unilateral hemisphere can induce the facilitation of the excitability in the contralateral hemisphere. Since a previous study reported that the MEP amplitude was not facilitated after tSMS of 20-min duration over the contralateral M1 25 , this transient facilitation effect in the contralateral hemisphere after 30-min intervention is a novel finding of this study. However, compared to the suppression effect directly induced by tSMS, the facilitation effect of contralateral M1 was only shown just after tSMS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Meanwhile, as shown in this and previous tSMS studies, a short after-effect may be a disadvantage compared with a traditional NIBS tools. Since tSMS over the motor cortex for 30 min has been demonstrated to result in an after-effect of 30 min [10], it should be investigated whether a longer duration of tSMS over the temporal cortex similarly induces long-lasting after-effects on visuo-spatial cognitive function. Given the short after-effect, another potential clinical use could be to repeat tSMS in combination with rehabilitation for 4-8 weeks, like interventions using rTMS and tDCS [71,72].…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the magnet used for tSMS is safer, cheaper, and easier to use as compared to the other conventional NIBS techniques, tSMS has the attractive potential to be used in clinical practice to alleviate symptoms of various central nervous system diseases. For instance, in stroke patients tSMS may be effective in restoring the sensorimotor function of paralyzed limbs by suppressing excessive inter-hemispheric inhibition from the intact hemisphere to the affected hemisphere via the corpus callosum [1,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Also, tSMS's ability to reduce the amplitude of intra-epidermal electrical stimulation-evoked potentials [15] may lead to the development of chronic pain management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in alpha-band oscillatory power has also been demonstrated with tSMS over the temporal or occipital areas [15,16]. Furthermore, tSMS can modulate the activity of brain regions interconnected with the site of stimulation [17][18][19][20]. In particular, tSMS over the M1 can increase contralateral M1 excitability [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%