Effect of Trunk Restraint on the Recovery of Reaching Movements in Hemiparetic Patients

Abstract

Background and Purpose-Reaching movements made with the affected arm in hemiparetic patients are often accompanied by compensatory trunk or shoulder girdle movements, which extend the reach of the arm. We investigated the effects of the suppression of these compensatory movements on reaching ability in hemiparetic individuals. Methods-Eleven healthy and 11 hemiparetic individuals participated. Three-dimensional kinematic analysis was used to quantify reaches made to a close and a distant target (near the limit of arm's length). Unrestrained reaches were compared with those in which shoulder girdle and trunk movements were restrained by a harness. Results-During unrestrained reaching, abnormal trunk recruitment and limitations in elbow and shoulder movements were correlated with the degree of clinical stroke severity (rϭϪ0.91 to Ϫ0.96) in hemiparetic patients. During trunk restraint, ranges of elbow and shoulder joint movement increased in both groups. In addition, elbow and shoulder interjoint coordination improved. This was caused by increases in the range of joint motion as well as by a better dynamic temporal relation between joints. Conclusions-Trunk restraint allowed patients with hemiparetic stroke to make use of arm joint ranges that are present but not normally recruited during unrestrained arm-reaching tasks. Thus, the underlying "normal" patterns of movement coordination may not be entirely lost after stroke. Appropriate treatments, such as trunk restraint, may be effective in uncovering latent movement patterns to maximize arm recovery in hemiparetic patients.

Movement patterns of the upper extremity and trunk before and after corrective surgery of impaired forearm rotation in patients with cerebral palsy

“…From this perspective, maximal active supination alone may not be a valid parameter for the success of surgical treatment of a pronation deformity. This is in agreement with the observations of Michaelsen et al (2001) in a study on movement patterns of stroke patients. A limited elbow extension during activities that require some degree of forearm supination, for example, may very well be a movement associated with an impaired forearm supination.…”

Applications of Upper Limb Biomechanical Models in Spinal Cord Injury Patients

“…Following the recommendations of earlier studies, the body segments were defined by placing 8 markers on the superficial bony prominences of the right upper limb, which were easily positioned in the different analyses (Cirstea and Levin 2000;Michaelsen et al 2001;Murphy et al 2006;Dwan and McIntosh 2006). These markers were placed on the head of the third metacarpal, radial and ulnar styloid processes of the wrist, lateral and medial epicondyles of the elbow, right and left acromion and right iliac crest.…”

Using an accelerometer for analyzing a reach-to-grasp movement after stroke

“…When the velocity curve of reaching movements was evaluated in these subjects, it showed decrease in movement velocity, trajectory linearity and loss of smoothness (Michaelsen et al, 2001).…”