2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ultrasonic activation on the efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: Evaluation of penetration depth of photosensitizer and elimination of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study regarding the control groups 5 specimens did not receive CGM to ensure that the analysis of cleaned canal did not yield false positive of residual CGM, likewise, 5 specimens received CGM without subsequent removal to assure that CGM was uniformly present in the simulated IRR cavities and that amount initially applied was significantly different from any amounts remaining after cleaning procedure in tested groups (25) In the present study , the complete removal of the colored gelatin material off the walls of the simulated IRR cavities was not obtained in any of the test groups (A,B) this was in accordance with previous studies (10,11,12,15,17 ) Regarding the results of the present study group A (cleaned using PUI) recorded a low Mean percentage of residual CGM at 16. 88% which comes in agreement with previous studies (4,5,6) Whom also found PUI to be an effective method of removing debris and smear layer , bacterial biofilm, intracanal medicaments in either normal canal configuration or simulated IRR cavities This may be due to the irrigation agitation which creates more intense shear forces with in the fluids in root canal which increases the irrigant penetration into the tissues and through the root canal and may explain the efficacy in flushing out CGM from IRR cavities as previously described by Jiang et al (26) . Furthermore the high velocity of the irrigation flow generated by PUI leads to acoustic energy and micro-streaming effect both result in increased flushing and cleaning ability of the irrigant (27) On the other hand concerning Group B (cleaned using XP-endo shaper followed by XP-endo finisher) a low recorded mean percentage of residual material at 12.677% was recorded which was significantly less than that of group A at p> 0.05 ; indicating superior cleaning ability of the XP-endo ( shaper\ finisher) combination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study regarding the control groups 5 specimens did not receive CGM to ensure that the analysis of cleaned canal did not yield false positive of residual CGM, likewise, 5 specimens received CGM without subsequent removal to assure that CGM was uniformly present in the simulated IRR cavities and that amount initially applied was significantly different from any amounts remaining after cleaning procedure in tested groups (25) In the present study , the complete removal of the colored gelatin material off the walls of the simulated IRR cavities was not obtained in any of the test groups (A,B) this was in accordance with previous studies (10,11,12,15,17 ) Regarding the results of the present study group A (cleaned using PUI) recorded a low Mean percentage of residual CGM at 16. 88% which comes in agreement with previous studies (4,5,6) Whom also found PUI to be an effective method of removing debris and smear layer , bacterial biofilm, intracanal medicaments in either normal canal configuration or simulated IRR cavities This may be due to the irrigation agitation which creates more intense shear forces with in the fluids in root canal which increases the irrigant penetration into the tissues and through the root canal and may explain the efficacy in flushing out CGM from IRR cavities as previously described by Jiang et al (26) . Furthermore the high velocity of the irrigation flow generated by PUI leads to acoustic energy and micro-streaming effect both result in increased flushing and cleaning ability of the irrigant (27) On the other hand concerning Group B (cleaned using XP-endo shaper followed by XP-endo finisher) a low recorded mean percentage of residual material at 12.677% was recorded which was significantly less than that of group A at p> 0.05 ; indicating superior cleaning ability of the XP-endo ( shaper\ finisher) combination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Regarding the present study irrigation volume and temperature and cleaning duration were standardized for all test groups. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of combined use of XP-endo shaper and finisher in cleaning IRR cavities compared to PUI Passive ultrasonic irrigation has been the treatment of choice over the years (4,5,6) . Though proven to be fairly successful method it falls short of completely removing granulation tissues from the hard to reach areas of the IRR defect (24) thus New treatment alternatives are continually been researched .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Niavarzi et al recently considered the hypothesis of combining these two strategies, by using ultrasounds to activate a PS (methylene blue), followed by PDT. In fact, ultrasonic activation of PS in conjugation with the PDT increased the penetration depth into E. faecalis biofilms, leading to greater antibiofilm activity of the PS compared to the use of PDT alone, with reduction bacterial counts of ∼98%, comparing to the control group (Niavarzi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapy and Ultrasoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A la microscopía se ha podido observar que el Enterococcus faecalis penetra en los túbulos dentinarios y que se constituye uno de los elementos que le permite a la bacteria poder soportar medios alcalinos con el del hidróxido de calcio y de los demás medicamentos. Ante ello, estudios como el de Niavarzi S. et al (30), en el 2019, desarrollaron los efectos del ultrasonido y la terapia fotodinámica, en los cuales evaluaron la profundidad de penetración de ambas técnicas para eliminar al biofilm del Enterococcus faecalis. Para tales fines, los dientes se dividieron aleatoriamente en tres grupos experimentales (n = 16) y un grupo control: Grupo A.…”
Section: Medicamento Intraconductounclassified