1963
DOI: 10.1037/h0047592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of various display-control configurations on tracking with identical and different coordinate dynamics.

Abstract: Position and acceleration dynamics were paired in a 2-coordinate tracking task so that both identical and different dynamics were used with the following display-control configurations: 1-dot display, 1-stick control; 1-dot display, 2-stick control; 2-dot display, 1-stick control; and 2-dot display, 2-stick control. The results showed a striking shift in the order of tracking proficiency for the various display-control configurations with the change from identical to different coordinate dynamics. When the sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The display and control integration can be varied independently when two axes are tracked. Results of Chernikoff and Lemay (1963) show that when two axes with similar dynamics are shared, there is an advantage of integrating displays and controls and that the effect of integrating displays was generally more beneficial than that of integrating controls. In the former case, a clear reduction in visual scanning is produced, while in the latter case the possibility of response interference is increased.…”
Section: Multiaxis Controlmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The display and control integration can be varied independently when two axes are tracked. Results of Chernikoff and Lemay (1963) show that when two axes with similar dynamics are shared, there is an advantage of integrating displays and controls and that the effect of integrating displays was generally more beneficial than that of integrating controls. In the former case, a clear reduction in visual scanning is produced, while in the latter case the possibility of response interference is increased.…”
Section: Multiaxis Controlmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Here we focus on two types of time-sharing strategies, referred to as task integration and task alternation. The opportunity to combine task dimensions, that is, task integration, can improve performance (e.g., Chernikoff and Lemay, 1963), or interfere with performance (e.g., a Stroop task). Often, when tasks need to be performed concurrently, they do not benefit from isolated performance, because it is only in the integration of the two tasks that the difficulty arises.…”
Section: Time-sharine Straterriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the numbo' of input devices, and thus the number of limbs needed, is reduced. Second, control performance can be improved with integrated controls, especially when an integrated multiple DOF display is used (Regan, 1960;Chernikoff & LeMay, 1963;Fracker & Wickens, 1989).…”
Section: Words 3 Dof Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the numbo' of input devices, and thus the number of limbs needed, is reduced. Second, control performance can be improved with integrated controls, especially when an integrated multiple DOF display is used (Regan, 1960;Chernikoff & LeMay, 1963;Fracker & Wickens, 1989).Understanding the limitations of the human operator in manual control tasks with multiple DOFs is necessary for an adequate design of systems that require the simultaneous control of multiple DOFs. The question arises how accurately the human operator is able to control each translational DOF, when an integrated control device in combination with an integrated display is used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%