2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp08056a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective pair potential between charged nanoparticles at high volume fractions

Abstract: Simulations of charged colloidal dispersions are technically challenging. One possible workaround consists in reducing the system to the colloids only, whose interactions are described through an effective pair potential, w. Still, the determination of w is difficult mainly because it depends on the colloidal density, ϕ. Here we propose to calculate w from simulations of a pair of colloids placed in a cubic box with periodic boundary conditions. The variation in ϕ is mimicked by an appropriate change in the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of an accurate interaction potential of the general application for charged interfacial colloids is not a trivial task and has been the subject of a considerable number of theoretical and experimental studies. , Charged colloids at air–fluid or fluid–fluid interfaces are typically in contact with two environments of differing dielectric properties and electrolyte contents and are, in addition, affected by wetting and capillary stress. These aspects introduce specific features in the interactions between the colloids that add complexity with respect to the analogous interactions in the bulk of a solution. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of an accurate interaction potential of the general application for charged interfacial colloids is not a trivial task and has been the subject of a considerable number of theoretical and experimental studies. , Charged colloids at air–fluid or fluid–fluid interfaces are typically in contact with two environments of differing dielectric properties and electrolyte contents and are, in addition, affected by wetting and capillary stress. These aspects introduce specific features in the interactions between the colloids that add complexity with respect to the analogous interactions in the bulk of a solution. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our MD simulations, we use the restricted primitive model (RPM) , where the charged components interact via Coulomb and hard core interactions, which has successfully described both ionic and superionic gels . This is necessary because the Debye–Hückel (DH) approximation and other continuum theories cannot describe dense charged colloidal systems and particularly fail to describe ionic compounds and ion-driven condensation . In the simulations, we kept the volume fraction of large NPs in the solution constant as 0.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] A model system for studying EPD is the directed assembly of particle layers from solutions of chemically synthesized, monodisperse microspheres. [3,4] Research complexities of colloidal interactions [22][23][24] and can be experimentally extracted from video microscopy and particle tracking methods. [25][26][27][28] Here, we report on an approach to measure coarse-grained, effective interparticle potentials for glass microspheres on an electrode surface under the influence of DC-driven electrophoresis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simplified description of these behaviors in terms of an effective pair potential can capture the effects of the experimental parameters (particle density, electrode potential, solution composition) while encapsulating the underlying electrostatics and hydrodynamics of the electrolyte. Effective pair potentials are often used to simplify the underlying complexities of colloidal interactions [ 22–24 ] and can be experimentally extracted from video microscopy and particle tracking methods. [ 25–28 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%