Effective Personality as a Protective Factor in Teachers’ Occupational Health

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been a growing body of research showing the relationship between teaching work and several health problems, both physical and psychological. Some of these studies relate personal competencies and resources to teachers’ occupational health. Based on the construct of Effective Personality, proposed by Martin del Buey, Martín Palacio, and Di Giusto, the aim was to analyse the relationship between the dimensions of the construct and Teachers’ Occupational Health. A descriptive cross-sectional design was used. It was based on the application of the Teacher Health Questionnaire (CSD) and the Efficacy Personality Questionnaire-Adults (CPE-A). The sample consisted of 700 non-university teachers aged between 26 and 66 years, M = 47.65 SD = 8.68. Descriptive, correlational, linear regression, and structural equation analyses were carried out. The results confirmed the relationship between the Efficacy Personality construct and Teachers’ Occupational Health (r = 0.45 **). In addition, the regression analysis indicated the relevance of each factor of Efficacy Personality in the factors of Teachers’ Occupational Health. The variance of Self-efficacy is the most explained by the dimensions of Efficacy Personality (40.2%), with positive relationships. The structural equation analysis confirmed the influence between Efficacy Personality and the factors of Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction, explaining 55.0% of the variance. It is concluded, therefore, that Efficacy Personality has a protective function on Teacher Occupational Health; the higher the Efficacy Personality scores are, the better the results in health gain—Self-efficacy and satisfaction—and the lower the result in health loss—burnout, cognitive affections, musculoskeletal affections, and voice alterations. These results facilitate the design of prevention and intervention programmes for teachers’ occupational health, which strengthen and improve personal and socio-affective competencies.

The relationship between effective personality and occupational health of lecturers: An empirical assessment in vietnam

“…Studies of Healey and Grossman [ 69 ], Rychlak and Slife [ 70 ] show positive correlation between effective personality với cognitive affections. On the other hand, effective personality has negative impacts on exhaustion, musculoskeletal disorders, and voice disturbance in occupational health of lecturers [ 18 , 71 ]. As such, H2 is accepted.…”

“…Responses of the lecturers are rated based on the Likert 5-point ranking from 1 to 5: 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = neither agree nor disagree; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree. This questionnaire is considered a good and relevant tool for assessing lecturers’ occupational health by monitoring current health status [ 18 ]. All results have a reliability coefficient of Cronbach's alpha >0.7, which demonstrates optimum outcomes in both questionnaires on effective personality and occupational health [ 59 ].…”

“…The GFI ≥0.9 is good, and GFI ≥0.95 is very good [ 61 , 64 ]. Standardized root-mean-square (SRMR) measures the number of errors of the model, the good fit has values below 0.05 [ 65 ] and the normed fit index (NFI) measures the statistical decline in statistics χ 2 of the model compared to the basic model, with minimum NFI value of 0.90 [ 18 ].…”

“…Effective personality, together with other factors, helps induce optimism, prevent occupational risks, and increase workers’ occupational health and happiness [ 53 ]. There have been recommendations for enhancing occupational health as well as effective personality, even paying attention to each factor of effective personality, to enhance the workers’ immunity to negative occupational effects and improve performance [ 18 , 54 , 55 ] explore in-depth each aspect of effective personality, e.g. self-esteem, labor self-realization, resolute self-efficacy, and social self-realization.…”

“…Therefore, there are calls for strengthening personal resources to improve occupational health, work organization manners, personal capacity, and power development. This help regulates and controls psychological variables to enhance the teachers’ quality [ 18 ].…”