2014
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective population size does not predict codon usage bias in mammals

Abstract: Synonymous codons are not used at equal frequency throughout the genome, a phenomenon termed codon usage bias (CUB). It is often assumed that interspecific variation in the intensity of CUB is related to species differences in effective population sizes (Ne), with selection on CUB operating less efficiently in species with small Ne. Here, we specifically ask whether variation in Ne predicts differences in CUB in mammals and report two main findings. First, across 41 mammalian genomes, CUB was not correlated wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(184 reference statements)
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the two intermediate taxa do not follow the predictions of weak selection. Thus, there is no consistent relationship between inferred effective population size and codon usage bias estimated from our exomes, as observed by Kessler and Dean (2014).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the two intermediate taxa do not follow the predictions of weak selection. Thus, there is no consistent relationship between inferred effective population size and codon usage bias estimated from our exomes, as observed by Kessler and Dean (2014).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…2). Natural selection shapes codon usage bias across mammals, but shows no consistent correlation to proxies of effective population size (Kessler and Dean 2014). The effective population sizes of M. m. castaneus , M. m. domesticus , and M. m. musculus have been genetically estimated at 220K, 100K, and 60K, respectively (Geraldes et al 2008; Geraldes et al 2011; Phifer-Rixey et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the ENC is independent of adult vertebrate body mass, consistent with past reports that effective population size does not predict codon usage in mammals (Figure 2C) (Kessler and Dean 2014). Note that a high ENC value means more codons are being used in the genome of the given species, so that the given species is less codon adapted, while a high CAIS value means that a species is more codon adapted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, the X chromosome shows stronger codon usage bias in Drosophila (Singh et al 2005), which in turn may inflate X-linked estimates of v (Campos et al 2013). There is also weak codon usage bias in mice, but unlike Drosophila, it is significantly weaker on the X chromosome (Kessler and Dean 2014) and therefore conservative with respect to the observation of faster-X protein evolution. Further, both lower mutation rates and shallower coalescent times likely contribute to less nucleotide divergence on the mouse X chromosome (Table S2), making the observation of higher X-linked d N conservative.…”
Section: Protein Evolution and Spermatogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%