Effects and Moderators of Triple P on the Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Problems of Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: Social, emotional, and behavioral problems in childhood are key predictors of persistent problem behaviors throughout the life courses of individuals. Early parental intervention training, as an important preventive measure, plays a critical role in improving the social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) development of children.Method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the intervention effects of the latest literature on Triple P (Positive Parenting Program), which is a multilevel system that provides treatment and prevention for children at risk of social, emotional, and behavioral problems via parenting approaches to enhance the parenting knowledge, skills, and confidence of parents. Since the literature on Triple P from 1970 to 2012 has already been systematically reviewed, this study searched the literature from 2013 to 2020 from the Web of Science, EBSCO, ERIC, MEDLINE, CNKI, and Triple P Evidence-Base website using multiple search strategies. This study differs from the existing research by its inclusion criteria of studies that use experimental designs or quasi-experimental designs. A total of 37 studies were included in the final analysis, and STATA 16.0 was used for evaluation while RevMan 5.3 for risk of bias assessment.Results: The results show that Triple P can promote the social competence of children (SMD = 0.274) and prevent their emotional (SMD = −0.254) and behavioral problems (SMD = −1.38) to a certain extent. Simultaneously, the proximal effects on parents mainly included changing negative parenting styles (SMD = −0.46), reducing parenting conflicts (SMD = −0.311), and improving parenting efficacy and self-confidence (SMD = 0.419). The distal effects on parents included reducing the psychological adjustment problems of parents (SMD = −0.265), improving parent–child relationships, and reducing parent–child conflict (SMD = −0.714). However, the meta-analysis results did not show a significant effect of Triple P on improving the marital relationship quality and satisfaction of parents (SMD = 0.063). Components of the program intervention, including intervention level, service delivery format, service method, and program implementation setting, and the age of the children were crucial moderating factors on the outcomes of Triple P.Conclusion: This study systematically reviewed the latest Triple P intervention literature and found the significant effectiveness of Triple P on the SEB problems of children and parenting outcomes and the moderators of the effect size.

An Integrated Analysis of the Impact of Spanish Family Support Programmes with Informed Evidence

“…There is also evidence that the impact of an intervention might tend to be moderated or mediated by the characteristics of the target population (e.g., Lagdon et al, 2021;Rubio-Hernández et al, 2020), the implementation (e.g., Li et al, 2021;Wright et al, 2017), or the evaluation (e.g., Knerr et al, 2013;Ttofi & Farrington, 2011;Vlahovicova et al, 2017). Specifically, the characteristics of implementations are a key factor in understanding a programme's success (Jeong, Franchett, et al, 2021;Mettert et al, 2020).…”

“…With the exception of the general characteristics of implementations, which are widely described in review studies (e.g., Gilligan et al, 2019;Li et al, 2021;Park, 2021), few results are reported on aspects relating to the institutional and external support that is required to boost the effectiveness of implementations. This leads to a current dilemma on the scientific dissemination of evidence-based programmes.…”

The Evaluation of Family Support Programmes in Spain. An Analysis of their Quality Standards

“…Although the quality standards related to programme evaluation are well known, there is not much empirical evidence about the extent to which family support programmes meet these criteria. To some extent, this lack of information is due to the fact that having a rigorous evaluation design (RCT or quasi-experimental with control group) is usually an inclusion criterion in meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the effectiveness of family support programmes (e.g., Arnason et al, 2020;Jeong et al, 2021;Li et al, 2021;Magioni & Williams, 2016;Rayce et al, 2017;Sama-Miller et al, 2019), thus programme evaluation studies that do not meet these quality standards are not usually published in peer-reviewed journals. This fact also explains that, in the review conducted by Barlow and Coren (2018) only six systematic reviews of the effectiveness of parenting programmes published in the Campbell Library were identified.…”

Multiple needs and multiple treatments. What's a clinician to do? Update on the psychosocial treatment of disruptive behaviours in childhood

“…At the broader intervention development level, recent efforts have focused on comprehensive modifications, guided by stakeholder consultation to improve outcomes [ 93 ]. For example, Triple P follows a process of partnering with community stakeholders to identify adaptations that meet the community's needs [ 16 , 94 ]. Adaptations include delivery in community centres, providing culturally relevant rationales for strategies, and the omission of topics deemed less culturally relevant (e.g.…”