“…However, earlier computational − and experimental studies , with crystalline Si disappointed the community by predicting/indicating that Si might be “inactive” toward hosting Na under the relevant electrochemical conditions. In fact, Kulish et al predicted a fairly large diffusion barrier (1.06 eV) and a positive binding energy (of 0.6 eV) for Na alloying with Si using first-principles calculations, although this conclusion was busted by the more recent studies, including ours, which indicated that it is primarily the limitation of Na transport in the coarser-sized Si particles/films ,,− and crystalline/defect-free nature of Si ,− ,− ,− that cause significant hindrance in Na uptake. In fact, our previously reported studies established that amorphous Si, unlike crystalline Si, does exhibit reversible Na alloying under the electrochemical conditions pertaining to being the anode of Na-ion cells. , Nevertheless, sodiation/desodiation was found to be kinetically more hindered, as compared to Li insertion/removal kinetics, since finer Si dimensions (preferably <∼50 nm) are needed for obtaining practically any useful performance as an anode material.…”