2018
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/77609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Combined Biological Restoration Technology on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal from Eutrophic Water

Abstract: Eutrophication resulting from high nutrient load has been a major environmental issue worldwide. Many biological restoration methods have been developed to remedy eutrophic waterbodies [1-2]. Among them, stocking planktivorous fish such as filter-feeding silver carp or bighead carp, has been proved to be effective in controlling blue-green algae blooms [3]. And introducing filter-feeding bivalves into water is also applied to control algal overgrowth [4]. In addition, the replanting of submerged macrophytes is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…China possesses a bountiful reserve of indigenous aquatic plants, noted for their abundant resources [21], with high ecological safety and water purification capacity. For example, the yellow-flowered water dragon, a native plant, exhibits an impressive removal rate of approximately 60% for total nitrogen in polluted water [35], which is 2.6 and 2.9 times that of water hyacinth and water peanut, respectively. Similarly, its removal rate for total phosphorus was approximately 25%, exceeding that of water hyacinth and water peanut by 0.7 and 1.9 times, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China possesses a bountiful reserve of indigenous aquatic plants, noted for their abundant resources [21], with high ecological safety and water purification capacity. For example, the yellow-flowered water dragon, a native plant, exhibits an impressive removal rate of approximately 60% for total nitrogen in polluted water [35], which is 2.6 and 2.9 times that of water hyacinth and water peanut, respectively. Similarly, its removal rate for total phosphorus was approximately 25%, exceeding that of water hyacinth and water peanut by 0.7 and 1.9 times, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%