Effects of a single interprofessional simulation session on medical and nursing students’ attitudes toward interprofessional learning and professional identity: a questionnaire study

Abstract

Background Participation in simulation-based interprofessional education (sim-IPE) may affect students’ attitudes towards interprofessional learning (through gaining experience with others) and their professional identity (by increasing the ‘fit’ of group membership). We examined this in two questionnaire studies involving students from four universities in two areas of the UK. Method Questionnaire data were collected before and after students took part in a sim-IPE session consisting of three acute scenarios. Questionnaires included the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and measures of professional identity derived from the social identity theory literature. In Study 1, only identification with Professional Group (doctor or nurse) was measured, while in Study 2 identification with Student Group (medical or nursing student) and the immediate interprofessional Team worked with in the simulation were also measured. Linear mixed effects regression analysis examined the effect of the simulation session, and differences between medical and nursing students, sites and identity measures. Results A total of 194 medical and 266 nursing students completed questionnaires. A five-item subset of RIPLS (RIPLSCore) was used in analysis. In both studies RIPLSCore increased for all groups following participation in sim-IPE, although this was larger for nursing students in Study 1. Nursing students had consistently higher RIPLSCore scores than medical students at one site. Effects of the session on identity varied between sites, and dimensions of identity. Notably, while positive emotions associated with group membership (Ingroup Affect) increased for Student Group, Professional Group and Team, the sense of belonging (Ingroup Ties) and importance (Centrality) of the group increased only for Team. Nursing students had consistently higher identification scores than medical students. Conclusions Participation in a sim-IPE session can improve attitudes towards interprofessional learning. It can also enhance professional identity, particularly as related to emotional aspects of group membership, with possible benefits for wellbeing. Changes in identification with the immediate Team suggest positive psychological consequences of ad hoc Team formation in the workplace. Differences between medical and nursing students suggest their differing opportunities to work with other professions during training may change baseline attitudes and identity. However, a single sim-IPE session can still have an additive effect.

Exploring the Impact of Pre-course High-Fidelity Simulation on Professional Socialization of Medical Students in Emergency Medicine Internship Rotation—A Qualitative Approach

“…Accumulating evidence indicates that simulation-based education integrated into health professions' students' clinical rotation can be used to augment block rotation (21)(22)(23). Simulation-based medical education (SBME) has emerged as a way to help students' maximize their block clinical learning and development experiences (8,24).…”

Effectiveness of simulation-based interprofessional education for medical and nursing students in South Korea: a pre-post survey

“…Thus, IPE can be implemented to improve students’ clinical performance so that effective communication, collaboration, and teamwork within the health care team can be achieved in the clinical setting [ 5 ]. As awareness of its importance grows, IPE is being increasingly implemented in healthcare-process education and studies have shown that through IPE, participating students developed a positive attitude toward interprofessional learning and that their collaboration skills improved [ 6 ].…”

Nurse’s Role from Medical Students’ Perspective during Their Interprofessional Clinical Practice: Evidence from Lithuania

“…Participation in interprofessional training can improve students' understanding of the identity of a profession [27]. This has been confirmed by a study conducted by U.K. researchers in which medicine and nursing students who participated in a sim-IPE session had a clearer and better understanding of each other's professions and greater teamwork abilities after the session compared with students who did not take part in that session [28]. Some researchers have commented on similar vulnerabilities and challenges of transdisciplinary practices including lack of clarity of problem definition, unbalanced problem ownership, conflicting methodological standards, and outcomes or solutions that have limited legitimacy and case-specificity [29,30].…”