2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of adaptive training on metacognitive knowledge monitoring ability in computer-based learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also identified tools that focus on cognitive and metacognitive characteristics/behaviour ( n = 4). An example is a tool that focuses on a combination of problems solved, steps taken and abilities of monitoring metacognitive knowledge (eg, PAT2Math; Kautzmann & Jaques, 2019).…”
Section: Research Results4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also identified tools that focus on cognitive and metacognitive characteristics/behaviour ( n = 4). An example is a tool that focuses on a combination of problems solved, steps taken and abilities of monitoring metacognitive knowledge (eg, PAT2Math; Kautzmann & Jaques, 2019).…”
Section: Research Results4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research conducted by [30] shows that students who received metacognitive instruction in computer-based learning showed a more significant increase in their metacognitive knowledge abilities. The research found [31] that computer-based integrated training can increase student creativity.…”
Section: Technology In Mathematics Learning and Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable learners to efficiently use the available help, they need to possess sufficient knowledge about how to use it (Stone, 2000), and it should be provided regularly during the learning tasks (Zimmerman, 1990) so that learners can practice with it (Winne, 1997). Activating learner's deeper critical thinking mechanisms, reflective judgment and regulation of motivation with appropriate help formats is expected to increase their awareness of why and when they really need help, and to improve their on‐task engagement and learning performance (Kautzmann & Jaques, 2019; Labuhn, Zimmerman, & Hasselhorn, 2010; Long & Aleven, 2017; Roll et al, 2006; Tsai, Lin, Hong, & Tai, 2018; Wolters, 1998). Engaging learners in metacognitive processes is not a straightforward task, unless learners are explicitly encouraged to do so through specialized instructional activities (Daley et al, 2016; Gama, 2004; Lin, 2001).…”
Section: The Impact Of On‐demand Metacognitive Help On Effortful Behamentioning
confidence: 99%