2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of attentional shifts along the vertical axis on number processing: An eye-tracking study with optokinetic stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar vein, Ranzini et al [53] observed that presenting graspable objects, as compared to ungraspable ones, enhanced the sensitivity to numerical magnitude during a subsequent number task (Experiment 1), but it reduced number magnitude sensitivity when participants were additionally required to hold an object in their hands (Experiment 2). Taken together, these bidirectional links suggest a functional relation between motor action and numerical processing, in agreement with embodied and grounded cognition accounts (see also: [54][55][56]).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a similar vein, Ranzini et al [53] observed that presenting graspable objects, as compared to ungraspable ones, enhanced the sensitivity to numerical magnitude during a subsequent number task (Experiment 1), but it reduced number magnitude sensitivity when participants were additionally required to hold an object in their hands (Experiment 2). Taken together, these bidirectional links suggest a functional relation between motor action and numerical processing, in agreement with embodied and grounded cognition accounts (see also: [54][55][56]).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The encoding of the response was followed by a 1000ms delay before the beginning of the next trial. Verbal responses were acquired with a microphone connected to a voice key; to prevent measurement errors due to its sensitivity, participants were trained to answer BA/BE for small/large digits (for similar procedures, see: [53][54][55][56]75]). Response mapping was counterbalanced between participants.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research evidence has indicated that native language (L1) processing is more than a purely symbolic process ( Kintsch, 1988 ; Glenverg and Kaschak, 2002 ; Felisatti et al, 2022 ), in which the sensorimotor system is also activated ( Barsalou, 1999 ). For example, in studies investigating the embodied effect in sentence comprehension ( Zwaan et al, 2002 ), researchers found that participants responded significantly faster to pictures consistent with the implied sentential content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative methods capture a participant’s saccadic response during a task designed to elicit directional SNAs. There is a rich variety of visual spatial tasks that can be used examine directional SNAs, either with explicit or implicit number comparisons [ 25 ], and while many have been used to examine the horizontal dimension, far less has been done with the vertical [ 25 ], and nearly nothing in the determining of the dominance of one dimension. We found only one study that could be used to consider dominance; Hesse and Bremmer [ 16 ] captured saccadic response during a parity type task, an interesting approach that may circumvent the issues arising from handedness [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%