1983
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1983.tb122565.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of cigarette smoking on the immune system: Follow‐up studies in normal subjects after cessation of smoking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
5

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
60
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are similar to Bennet and Reade[8] Hersey et al .,[21] and Barton et al . [18] who demonstrated decreased immunoglobulin A levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are similar to Bennet and Reade[8] Hersey et al .,[21] and Barton et al . [18] who demonstrated decreased immunoglobulin A levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These values were lesser compared to that of Hersey et al . [21] (1.38 ± 0.45 g/l), Norhagen Engstrom[16] (240 mg/l). These values were higher compared to that of Olson et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, studies have shown that smokers have a number of organ damages, 124-126 they have impaired immune function leading to an increased risk of infection, 127 their wound healing process is impaired by smoking due to interference with the production of collagen, 128 and finally, even young asymptomatic smokers have reduced pulmonary capacity, increased mucus production, and reduced ciliary function. Hence, studies have shown that smokers have a number of organ damages, 124-126 they have impaired immune function leading to an increased risk of infection, 127 their wound healing process is impaired by smoking due to interference with the production of collagen, 128 and finally, even young asymptomatic smokers have reduced pulmonary capacity, increased mucus production, and reduced ciliary function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We categorized smoking as follows: consistent smokers (smoked in two consecutive visits); consistent minimal or non-smokers (smoked <1 cigarette per day in two consecutive visits); recent quitters (smoked in the last visit but stopped smoking in the current visit); and new/relapsed smokers (not smoked in the last visit but started or resumed smoking in the current visit). The categorization was based on data from previous studies which suggest that the effect of smoking on the immune system is acute (Tollerud et al,1989Hersey, Prendergast, & Edwards, 1983; Sunyer et al, 1996), with induction period of about five weeks (Thomas, Holt, & Keast, 1975) to 10 weeks (Chalmer, Holt, & Keast, 1975), and lasts for about six to 35 weeks since quitting (Thomas, Holt, & Keast, 1975; Miller, Goldstein, Murphy, & Ginns, 1982; Radloff, 1977). Since the time elapsed between the last HIV-ALC visit to the first HIV-LIVE visit was too long (range one month to 66 months) for some of the subjects enrolled in both cohorts, this secondary analysis was restricted to subjects who participated in HIV-LIVE.…”
Section: Design and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%