2021
DOI: 10.1088/1555-6611/ac2ccf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of classical fluctuating environments on decoherence and bipartite quantum correlation dynamics

Abstract: We address the time evolution of quantum correlations (QCs) such as entanglement, purity, and coherence for a model of two non-interacting qubits initially prepared as a maximally entangled bipartite state. We contrast the comparative potential of the classical fields to preserve these QCs in the noisy and noiseless realms. We also disclose the characteristic dynamical behavior of the QCs of the two-qubit state under the static noise effects originating from the common and different configuration models. We sh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of prior research on the dynamical map of two and three qubits under the influence of non‐Markov environments appear to be different, with shorter quantum correlations preservation. [ 56,57 ] The non‐Markovian character of contemporary classical fields with RT noise is stronger than that reported in [58], which is characterized by static and RT noise. It is also worth mentioning that the mixed non‐Markovian effects of statics and RT noise had a different effect on the memory properties of the environments than in this case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of prior research on the dynamical map of two and three qubits under the influence of non‐Markov environments appear to be different, with shorter quantum correlations preservation. [ 56,57 ] The non‐Markovian character of contemporary classical fields with RT noise is stronger than that reported in [58], which is characterized by static and RT noise. It is also worth mentioning that the mixed non‐Markovian effects of statics and RT noise had a different effect on the memory properties of the environments than in this case.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As seen by comparing previous results given in refs. [21,24,35,36,45,54,[57][58][59] to the current ones. Quantum correlations, coherence, and purity are all lost periodically when non-Markovian effects are maximized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entanglement of two qubits can be measured by the concurrence C , which is defined as [ 45,46 ] C=max[]0,2maxλrr=14λr\begin{equation} C=\max {\left[ 0,2\max {\left[ \lambda _{r}\right]}-\sum _{r=1}^{4}\lambda _{r}\right]} \end{equation}where the quantities, λr(r=1,2,3,4)$\lambda _{r}(r=1,2,3,4)$ are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix normalΓ=ρθρ*θ$\Gamma =\rho \theta \rho ^{\ast }\theta$, ρ is the density matrix and θ=σyfalse(1false)σyfalse(2false)$\theta =\sigma _{y}^{(1)}\otimes \sigma _{y}^{(2)}$. Based on the definition of concurrence, the entanglement of two two‐level atoms can be obtained as C=max[]0,2ρ23ρ32ρ11ρ44\begin{equation} C=\max {\left[ 0,2{\left(\sqrt {\rho _{23}\rho _{32}}-\sqrt {\rho _{11}\rho _{44}}\right)} \right]} \end{equation}…”
Section: Entropic Uncertainty and Correlation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixedness and, as a result, disentanglement is caused by defects such as entropic disorder. [ 45–47 ] We will also quantify the degree of mixedness in this manuscript, in addition to looking into the entanglement measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the quantum mechanical model describes phenomena by a quantization scheme [3][4][5][6] for analytical and computational manipulations of quantum nature, such as quantum decoherence, quantum correlations (QCs), and quantum entanglement. [7][8][9][10] The combinations of both models can help with the study of light-matter interactions for the enhancement of optical-based sensors. 11,12 When light and metallic nanoparticles (MNPs) interact on the metal surface (MS), free electrons transit from the ground state to the excited state and vice versa (jgi 4 jei) by an amount u, depending on the intensity of incident light and meta-stable state of MNPs and MS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%