1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00316.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Communication Expectancies, Actual Communication, and Expectancy Disconfirmation on Evaluations of Communicators and Their Communication Behavior

Abstract: The current investigation addressed (a) thepersewrance ofpreinteraction expectancies in the face of actual wmmunication behavior, (b) the separate effects of personal attribute and communication expectancies, and (c) the role of expectancy wnfirmation or diswnfirmation on postinteraction evaluations. Participant perceivers were induced to holdpositimornegative expectancies regarding a target partner's general personal attributes and spec@ communication behavior prior to a problem-solving discussion. They then… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
188
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
13
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, our study also provides empirical support to the expectancy violation theory (Burgoon & LePoire, 1993;Rhee & Haunschild, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In this regard, our study also provides empirical support to the expectancy violation theory (Burgoon & LePoire, 1993;Rhee & Haunschild, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Exceeding people's expectations improved their perceptions and outcomes of supportive interactions, whereas not meeting people's expectations corresponded with poor evaluations of support. Researchers have devoted attention to understanding people's expectations for interpersonal (Burgoon & Le Poire, 1993;White, 2015) and even supportive interactions (Pierce et al, 1991); however, this is the first study to examine the effects of support gaps based on those expectations. Similar to how prior research differentiates positive from negative expectancy violations, we compared exceeded and unmet expectations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expectancy violations theory (e.g., Burgoon and Hale 1988;Burgoon and LePoire 1993) postulates that behavior which sufficiently deviates from existing expectancies in a positive direction leads to a positive re-evaluation of an actor. In addition, the theory holds that the more strongly the positive behavior deviates from expectancies, the stronger the positive effects on observers' attitudes toward the actor are (Afifi and Burgoon 2000;Burgoon and Hale 1988).…”
Section: The Link Between Csr Performance and Trustworthinessmentioning
confidence: 99%