2000
DOI: 10.4148/2378-5977.1788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of feeding two microbial additives in sequence on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing heifers (2000)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the conditions of this study, little advantage was observed in feeding P169 with regard to growth performance or carcass traits of feedlot cattle fed a corn-and corn DDGS-based finishing diet, which is in agreement with findings from other studies using Propionibacterium (Galyean et al 2000;Elam et al 2003). Huck et al (2000) also reported that feeding Propionibacterium freudenreichii to finishing heifers fed a corn-based diet did not affect ADG, DMI, or feed efficiency compared with Controls. In contrast, Swinney-Floyd et al (1999) found improved feed efficiency (5.32 kg DMI kg (1 ADG) in feedlot steers feed a wheat and corn-based diet supplemented with P. feudenreichii P63.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Under the conditions of this study, little advantage was observed in feeding P169 with regard to growth performance or carcass traits of feedlot cattle fed a corn-and corn DDGS-based finishing diet, which is in agreement with findings from other studies using Propionibacterium (Galyean et al 2000;Elam et al 2003). Huck et al (2000) also reported that feeding Propionibacterium freudenreichii to finishing heifers fed a corn-based diet did not affect ADG, DMI, or feed efficiency compared with Controls. In contrast, Swinney-Floyd et al (1999) found improved feed efficiency (5.32 kg DMI kg (1 ADG) in feedlot steers feed a wheat and corn-based diet supplemented with P. feudenreichii P63.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…No significant differences were observed for any carcass characteristics in the current study, however, BOVD tended to increase the percent of Choice + Prime carcasses when compared to control. Huck et al (2000) reported a similar increase in Prime + Choice carcasses in heifers receiving Propionibacterium DFM versus controls, which agrees with the tendency that we observed [26]. Other studies have also failed to identify differences in carcass characteristics outside of conflicting results on HCW that are likely a function of the varied responses on The differences reported in these studies coincided with a comparable improvement in final BW.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Galyean et al (2000) noted increased HCW (P ≤ 0.05) for the average of DFM treatments vs. control, but other carcass characteristics did not differ among treatments. Huck et al (2000) fed heifers a control diet or 1 of 4 treatments (10 pens/treatment): (1) L. acidophilus BG2FO4 for the entire period, (2) P. freudenreichii P-63 for the entire period; (3) L. acidophilus BG2FO4 for 28 d, followed by P. freudenreichii P-63 for the remainder of the period; and (4) P. freudenreichii P-63 for 28 d, followed by L. acidophilus BG2FO4 for the remainder of the period. These authors reported a trend for the percentage of Choice or Prime carcasses to be greater when P. freudenreichii P-63 was fed for the entire feeding period than for other treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%