2017
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2017.169.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Humate and Probiotic on the Number of Escherichia coli, Blood and Antioxidant Parameters in Suckling Period of Calves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physiological value of normal biocenosis is characterized by a high titer of bifidobacteria and E. coli , which have high antagonistic properties that prevent the development of pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms [ 68 , 74 , 76 , 77 ]. The main groups of microorganisms’ comparative characteristics in the intestinal contents showed that spore bacteria’s probiotic effect did not affect lacto- and bifidobacteria in lambs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological value of normal biocenosis is characterized by a high titer of bifidobacteria and E. coli , which have high antagonistic properties that prevent the development of pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms [ 68 , 74 , 76 , 77 ]. The main groups of microorganisms’ comparative characteristics in the intestinal contents showed that spore bacteria’s probiotic effect did not affect lacto- and bifidobacteria in lambs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ipek et al (2008) reported that lower levels of humic acid did not have an influence on total antioxidant capacity, but high levels reduced total antioxidant capacity in Japanese quails. Tunç & Yörük (2017) found that humate additives had a positive effect on the suckling period of calves, which can lead to oxidative stress. Therefore, because of effects of SH and FWBPs on antioxidant enzymes and other parameters investigated in the present study at 21 d and 42 d, the inclusion level and administration period of the two additives should be investigated when they are used in broilers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected to become one of the new feed additives to replace antibiotics. Studies have shown that FuA could improve growth performance and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs and juvenile loaches ( Bai et al, 2013 ; Chang et al, 2013 ; Gao et al, 2017 ), stimulate the immune response of rats and Litopenaeus vannamei ( Vucskits et al, 2010 ; Gutiérrez-Dagnino et al, 2015 ), increase the shear force and intramuscular fat level of calf meat and decrease the pH of the meat ( Leeuw et al, 2017 ; Mokotedi et al, 2018 ), and reduce the number of harmful pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli in the intestinal tract of calves ( Tunc and Yoruk, 2017 ). FuA could also increase milk yield and reduce cholesterol levels in whole blood and serum in dairy goats ( Degirmencioglu and Ozbilgin, 2013 ; Degirmencioglu, 2014 ), decrease the rate of carbohydrate degradation ( Majewska et al, 2017 ) and also increase the number of rumen protozoa ( Kara and Buda, 2016 ) in sheep.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%