2014
DOI: 10.2172/1177045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of increasing tip velocity on wind turbine rotor design.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 summarizes important rotor performance parameters for selected designs. Additional detailed plots and discussion of aerodynamic performance parameters are found in the detailed rotor design report associated with this work (Resor et al, 2014).…”
Section: Aero-structural Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 4 summarizes important rotor performance parameters for selected designs. Additional detailed plots and discussion of aerodynamic performance parameters are found in the detailed rotor design report associated with this work (Resor et al, 2014).…”
Section: Aero-structural Optimization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was conservative because it included tip-deflections at azimuth angles that were far from the tower. More detail on the above analyses can be found in the full rotor design report (Resor et al, 2014).…”
Section: Structural Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A study by Jamieson suggests that a 15%-20% reduction in turbine capital costs is possible for a flexible downwind configuration with very high tip speeds [5]. A precursor study done by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and Sandia National Laboratories was recently completed using a sequential optimization process for a wind turbine in which the rotor was first optimized, the nacelle and tower were subsequently optimized, and a cost-of-energy analysis was performed for the overall system [6,7]. This study estimated that up to a 3% reduction in the cost of energy was possible when an optimized point design at a 100-m/s tip-speed limit was compared to a baseline optimized design at an 80-m/s limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%