1988
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90269-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of incremental versus bulk fill technique on resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
5

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the type of incremental technique affects the amount of applied restorative material, and therefore cusp displacement. These findings are in contrast with some studies that stated that the incremental technique reduces the polymerization shrinkage effects 2,21 . In spite of this study's results, the incremental techniques should be used to achieve both good mechanical properties associated with a high rate of conversion and close adaptation of the resin composites to the cavity wall.…”
Section: (1987) Davidson Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, the type of incremental technique affects the amount of applied restorative material, and therefore cusp displacement. These findings are in contrast with some studies that stated that the incremental technique reduces the polymerization shrinkage effects 2,21 . In spite of this study's results, the incremental techniques should be used to achieve both good mechanical properties associated with a high rate of conversion and close adaptation of the resin composites to the cavity wall.…”
Section: (1987) Davidson Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…An incremental build‐up technique (13) is considered to be the optimal technique for the placement of composite resins. The reasons for this are to ensure complete penetration of the curing light through the composite and to minimize contraction stresses during polymerization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The restoration was progressively built up with photoactivation following each increment (1200 mW/cm² for 40 s) using an LED light (Bluephase, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). All specimens were subjected to compressive axial loading (0.5 mm/min.)…”
Section: Methodology Compressive Loading Testmentioning
confidence: 99%