1992
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90472-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intravenous urokinase versus alteplase on total pulmonary resistance in acute massive pulmonary embolism: A European multicenter double-blind trial

Abstract: Twelve centers participated in a double-blind study in which 63 patients with angiographically documented acute massive pulmonary embolism were randomly assigned to treatment with either urokinase (4,400 U/kg as an intravenous bolus infusion, then 4,400 U/kg per h over 12 h; n = 29) or alteplase (10 mg as an intravenous bolus infusion, then 90 mg over 2 h) followed by heparin (n = 34). The primary objective was to compare the resolution of pulmonary embolism as judged by the change in total pulmonary resistanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0
12

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
79
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…47,48 Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is typically infused over two hours, compared to a 12-hr infusion with streptokinase and up to 24 hr of administration with urokinase. Evidence from RCTs, reporting on patients with massive [49][50][51][52][53][54] and submassive 52,55 PE, favour thrombolysis over heparinization. Randomized controlled trials comparing streptokinase and alteplase, in massive PE, 56,57 and urokinase and rTPA 58 failed to demonstrate superiority of one thrombolytic over another.…”
Section: Systemic Thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is typically infused over two hours, compared to a 12-hr infusion with streptokinase and up to 24 hr of administration with urokinase. Evidence from RCTs, reporting on patients with massive [49][50][51][52][53][54] and submassive 52,55 PE, favour thrombolysis over heparinization. Randomized controlled trials comparing streptokinase and alteplase, in massive PE, 56,57 and urokinase and rTPA 58 failed to demonstrate superiority of one thrombolytic over another.…”
Section: Systemic Thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Así, reteplase posee mayor rapidez y duración de acción 16 , tenecteplase tiene bajo clearance y mayor especificidad por fibrina [17][18][19][20] , desmoteplase posee vida media más larga y es dos veces más potente 21 . El riesgo de los trombolíticos son las hemorragias, con tasas de hemorragia mayor de 13% y letal de 1,8% 11,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] . En pacientes inestables los trombolíticos reducen la mortalidad (19 La controversia para el uso de los trombolíticos se centra en los pacientes hemodinámicamente estables 35 .…”
Section: Trombolíticosunclassified
“…Así, si la trombolisis está indicada, pero existe alto riesgo de sangrado, podría considerarse el uso de media dosis. Así, en caso de estar indicada la terapia, el tratamiento es en infusión continua y se debe utilizar en media dosis del bolo en caso de paro, debido a la distribución limitada de la droga cuando la perfusión se encuentra comprometida 28,29 . En definitiva, en TEP, para maximizar los beneficios de la trombolisis, se sugiere utilizar HNF con trombolítico 28,30,58 , reiniciando la infusión de HNF en pacientes con TEP submasivo cuando TTPa es menor que 60 a 80 segundos 59 .…”
Section: Electrocardiogramaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pulmoner embolide onay alan trombolitik rejimler streptokinaz (SK), ürokinaz (UK), rt-PA dır ve birbirlerine üstünlükleri gösterilememiştir. Çalışmalarda intrakraniyal kanama oranı %1,8 olarak bildirilmiştir (8)(9)(10)(11). İntrakraniyal kanama riski trombolitik tedavi ile %1,8 olmakla birlikte, bu oran serebravasküler hastalık öyküsü olan olgularda yükselmektedir.…”
Section: Ninds (The National Institute Of Neurologicalunclassified