2018
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of lexical ambiguity on perception: A test of the label feedback hypothesis using a visual oddball paradigm.

Abstract: We used a visual oddball paradigm to investigate whether a shared verbal label makes two objects belonging to different conceptual categories less perceptually distinct. In Experiment 1, the critical images shared a label as well as some perceptual features referring to the color and the fruit), and in Experiment 2, the critical images shared a label but no perceptual features referring to the animal and the sports equipment). In both experiments comparison images were similar to each of the critical images bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(123 reference statements)
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each participant, the data from the 5 electrodes were averaged. This focus on parieto-occipital electrodes is consistent with recent vMMN studies which also have presented only data averaged across electrodes in this area (e.g., Athanasopoulos et al, 2010; Boutonnet et al, 2013; Jouravlev et al, 2018; Mo, Xu, Kay & Tan, 2011; Thierry et al, 2009). To ensure that ERPs reflect only the deviancy effect rather than specific perceptual characteristics of stimuli, ERPs elicited by robin and ostrich were averaged when they were presented as standards and, further, when they were presented as deviants.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For each participant, the data from the 5 electrodes were averaged. This focus on parieto-occipital electrodes is consistent with recent vMMN studies which also have presented only data averaged across electrodes in this area (e.g., Athanasopoulos et al, 2010; Boutonnet et al, 2013; Jouravlev et al, 2018; Mo, Xu, Kay & Tan, 2011; Thierry et al, 2009). To ensure that ERPs reflect only the deviancy effect rather than specific perceptual characteristics of stimuli, ERPs elicited by robin and ostrich were averaged when they were presented as standards and, further, when they were presented as deviants.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the current study, the vMMN effect appeared in the same early window (140–180 ms) and in the same scalp location (posterior) as in previous studies investigating vMMN effects (e.g., Athanasopoulos et al, 2010; Jouravlev et al, 2018). The early timing of the vMMN component is one reason that it is believed to reflect only perceptual processes (Boutonnet et al, 2013); lexical access for a newly-presented item is not likely to have occurred at this early time window.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations