2017
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of livestock grazing on rangeland biodiversity: A meta‐analysis of grouse populations

Abstract: Livestock grazing affects over 60% of the world's agricultural lands and can influence rangeland ecosystem services and the quantity and quality of wildlife habitat, resulting in changes in biodiversity. Concomitantly, livestock grazing has the potential to be detrimental to some wildlife species while benefiting other rangeland organisms. Many imperiled grouse species require rangeland landscapes that exhibit diverse vegetation structure and composition to complete their life cycle. However, because of declin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in China, free‐ranging livestock consumes considerable amounts of bamboo, which is partly responsible for the degradation of the giant panda habitat (Hull et al, ; Li, Pimm, Li, Zhao, & Luo, ). Livestock grazing also has a negative impact on grouse populations worldwide (Dettenmaier, Messmer, Hovick, & Dahlgren, ). Similarly, our study revealed that the high livestock density has a significant negative impact on red panda habitat at a large spatial scale in Nepal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in China, free‐ranging livestock consumes considerable amounts of bamboo, which is partly responsible for the degradation of the giant panda habitat (Hull et al, ; Li, Pimm, Li, Zhao, & Luo, ). Livestock grazing also has a negative impact on grouse populations worldwide (Dettenmaier, Messmer, Hovick, & Dahlgren, ). Similarly, our study revealed that the high livestock density has a significant negative impact on red panda habitat at a large spatial scale in Nepal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the system structure in the mental models, the variables related to the ecosystem services of the Páramos and their relationship with agricultural activities were also included in the causal diagram ( Figure 5). Human population in the paramo and high mountain Human population in the paramo and high mountain Agricultural and livestock activities exert extractive pressure on the natural resources of Páramo ecosystems (soil, vegetation, water) [40,[50][51][52]. For example, the trampling caused by cattle for long periods of time generates soil compaction [53][54][55] which in turn, results in less water infiltration, more runoff [56], reduction of plant cover [57], and lower absorption of nutrients by plants [58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems 2019, 7, 52 12 of 17 livelihoods that ensure food security, health, education, and decent housing. In particular, to be sustainable and viable, the minimum values of PES should at least equal the benefits provided in ecological terms and in opportunity costs that should be sustained to provide the same services with specific actions and less expensive than the avoided damages of the entire ecosystem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of conifers to improve sage‐grouse habitat, however, could also benefit many other lizard and snake species that prefer open sagebrush shrublands and are also susceptible to avian predators. Finally, similar to sage‐grouse, reptiles appear to have mixed responses to grazing because of variation in timing, frequency, and duration of grazing, and livestock type, stocking rate, and other factors (Beck and Mitchell 2000, Dettenmaier et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%