2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/318204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Lower Limb Length and Body Proportions on the Energy Cost of Overground Walking in Older Persons

Abstract: Background. Although walking has been extensively investigated in its biomechanical and physiological aspects, little is known on whether lower limb length and body proportions affect the energy cost of overground walking in older persons. Methods. We enrolled 50 men and 12 women aged 65 years and over, mean 69.1 ± SD 5.4, who at the end of their cardiac rehabilitation program performed the six-minute walk test while wearing a portable device for direct calorimetry and who walked a distance comparable to that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We presented the unadjusted model (Model 1), then the model adjusted for age, history of stroke, and height (Model 2). Age and history of stroke were included due to their known associations with walking capacity (19,23,(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64) and global cognitive function (18, 65), and height was included to account for the known energy efficiency associated with walking with longer lower limb lengths (energy cost 2.6% lower for each 1 cm longer length) (66). To determine if there were sex-based differences in the association between global cognitive function and walking capacity, we included sex and an interaction term between sex*6 MWT distance in Models 3 and 4.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We presented the unadjusted model (Model 1), then the model adjusted for age, history of stroke, and height (Model 2). Age and history of stroke were included due to their known associations with walking capacity (19,23,(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64) and global cognitive function (18, 65), and height was included to account for the known energy efficiency associated with walking with longer lower limb lengths (energy cost 2.6% lower for each 1 cm longer length) (66). To determine if there were sex-based differences in the association between global cognitive function and walking capacity, we included sex and an interaction term between sex*6 MWT distance in Models 3 and 4.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%