2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of metal loading and support for supported cobalt catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 1 and 2, with an increase in metal loading, the presence of surface metal species increase and the methane conversion gradually increases, though not detected by XRD. These results are agreed well with the results described by other reseachers [8,28].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Catalystssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure 1 and 2, with an increase in metal loading, the presence of surface metal species increase and the methane conversion gradually increases, though not detected by XRD. These results are agreed well with the results described by other reseachers [8,28].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Catalystssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is similiar for Cr/Al catalysts, the chromium metal size increased from 1.09 nm to 1.6 nm and to 2.1 nm for 5 wt% Cr/Al, 10 wt% Cr/Al, and 15 wt% Cr/Al, respectively. This suggests that with an increase in loading the metal size also increase [28]. However, Co/Al catalysts metal sizes were larger than those observed for Cr/Al catalysts.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With all other conditions held equal, cobalt impregnation and further calcination at 450 °C resulted in reduction of S BET and V meso . The decrease of approximately 50 % of pore volume of the catalyst prepared with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) (Al‐PEO6 and Al‐PEO8) was related to the partial blockage of the pores . Accordingly, for the Co/Al‐PEO8 sample the average mesopore diameters significantly decrease (≈37 %) after those processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%