2016
DOI: 10.5897/jene2016.0564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of microhabitat and large-scale land use on stream salamander occupancy in the coalfields of Central Appalachia

Abstract: Large-scale coal mining practices, particularly surface coal extraction and associated valley fills as well as residential wastewater discharge, are of ecological concern for aquatic systems in central Appalachia. Identifying and quantifying alterations to ecosystems along a gradient of spatial scales is a necessary first-step to aid in mitigation of negative consequences to aquatic biota. In central Appalachian headwater streams, apart from fish, salamanders are the most abundant vertebrate predator that prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional purposively selected survey sites were limited to a specific set of counties to help fill knowledge gaps of the Texas distribution of the species (Rosenbaum et al 2023). We used 3 criteria to determine if aquatic habitats in these locations were suitable for trapping: accessibility via public access points or landowner permission (Sweeten and Ford 2016), navigability by foot or boat, and no habitat constraints (i.e., limited channel depth and width) that would prevent submergence of trap funnels. We sampled only sites that were permanent and exhibited at least ephemeral connection with tributaries because of the predominantly aquatic habits and poor overland dispersal ability of the species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional purposively selected survey sites were limited to a specific set of counties to help fill knowledge gaps of the Texas distribution of the species (Rosenbaum et al 2023). We used 3 criteria to determine if aquatic habitats in these locations were suitable for trapping: accessibility via public access points or landowner permission (Sweeten and Ford 2016), navigability by foot or boat, and no habitat constraints (i.e., limited channel depth and width) that would prevent submergence of trap funnels. We sampled only sites that were permanent and exhibited at least ephemeral connection with tributaries because of the predominantly aquatic habits and poor overland dispersal ability of the species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%