16th International Conference on VLSI Design, 2003. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/icvd.2003.1183127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of multi-cycle sensitization on delay tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist two delay fault models: path delay faults and gate delay faults, here we use path delay faults. So far, the test of delay faults is studied intensively [9,10]. Chakradhar et al presented an effective approach that formulates delay test generation as energy function minimization problem [11], this extends the previous results [3,5] on stuck-at faults to delay faults.…”
Section: An Energy Model For Delay Faults Testingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There exist two delay fault models: path delay faults and gate delay faults, here we use path delay faults. So far, the test of delay faults is studied intensively [9,10]. Chakradhar et al presented an effective approach that formulates delay test generation as energy function minimization problem [11], this extends the previous results [3,5] on stuck-at faults to delay faults.…”
Section: An Energy Model For Delay Faults Testingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This gives rise to a greater test time with LOC [12]. Since the initialization pattern, being loaded through scan, might not be a valid state of the circuit, even LOC can detect faults which can be proven redundant under a greater sequential depth [17]. However, since LOC restricts the number of redundant transition faults that are tested, its use has been popular.…”
Section: Launch Off Capture (Loc)mentioning
confidence: 99%