2018 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications &Amp; Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iscaie.2018.8405460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of permanent and recoverable component of NBTI mechanisms on flip flop circuits designed using planar MOSFET and FinFET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MOSRA is the built-in aging model integrated into Synopsys HSPICE, which can be used to predict the long-term reliability and performance of the circuit. Recently, MOSRA was deployed in many studies for reliability simulation and circuit design using the Synopsis HSPICE platform [17][18][19]. It should be noted that the MOSRA model itself is also constructed on the basis of a specific NBTI analytic model.…”
Section: Mosfet Model Reliability Analysis (Mosra) Aging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MOSRA is the built-in aging model integrated into Synopsys HSPICE, which can be used to predict the long-term reliability and performance of the circuit. Recently, MOSRA was deployed in many studies for reliability simulation and circuit design using the Synopsis HSPICE platform [17][18][19]. It should be noted that the MOSRA model itself is also constructed on the basis of a specific NBTI analytic model.…”
Section: Mosfet Model Reliability Analysis (Mosra) Aging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to [23,24], our work also used the Nangate 45nm Open Cell Library, assuming 400 K and 10 years of operation during the experiment, and the simulation results of HSPICE were used to verify the accuracy and runtime performance. In [18,19], the aged delay of each circuit path in the designated 10th year was measured (corresponding tod xo 8 in this paper) and then compared with the HSPICE date (corresponding to the d xo 8 ). The obvious difference is that [23,24] calculated the aged path delay using the LUT method, while our proposed method was a machining learning framework at the circuit path level.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%