2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps09934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of phylogeny and prey type on fatty acid calibration coefficients in three pinniped species: implications for the QFASA dietary quantification technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In accord with previous studies (Budge et al, 2012;Rosen and Tollit, 2012), overestimating the presence of the item used as prey for CC calculations was also observed. Without questioning the necessity of using CC to compensate for lipid metabolism of the predator, it is important to highlight that the incorrect construction or improper use of CC can lead to poorer estimations.…”
Section: Feeding Trial and Calibration Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accord with previous studies (Budge et al, 2012;Rosen and Tollit, 2012), overestimating the presence of the item used as prey for CC calculations was also observed. Without questioning the necessity of using CC to compensate for lipid metabolism of the predator, it is important to highlight that the incorrect construction or improper use of CC can lead to poorer estimations.…”
Section: Feeding Trial and Calibration Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The determination of how long these experiments have to last to truly reflect the diet in the predator fat storage tissue is critical (Budge et al, 2006). Several studies have been conducted to determine calibration coefficients for birds and mammals (Iverson et al, 2007;Nordstrom et al, 2008;Rosen and Tollit, 2012;Wang et al, 2010;Williams et al, 2009) but, in regard to fish, only Atlantic salmon has been studied (Budge et al, 2011(Budge et al, , 2012. A careful selection of the predator fat store tissue to use in QFASA has been shown to be of crucial importance (Budge et al, 2006;Iverson, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Future studies, including continued harvest-based monitoring of the Mackenzie Estuary beluga harvest (Bell and Harwood, 2012), are important to continue to monitor the trends we have observed. To infer dietary change, these studies could be coupled with diet profiling studies using fatty acids (e.g., Dahl et al, 2000;Theimann et al, 2008) and stable isotopes (Kelly, 2000;Chambellant et al, 2012), provided that appropriate calibration coefficients could be determined (Rosen and Tollit, 2012). Such studies in turn would contribute to our understanding of feeding strategies and eventually provide a quantitative assessment of the time and location of resources selected by belugas throughout their range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To handle this, Iverson et al [8] introduced calibration factors and we accordingly also calibrate the FAs before estimating the diet. A discussion of the calibration factors used in our analysis may be found in [17].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%