2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0807-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on anal sphincter functions and quality of life in rectal cancer patients

Abstract: Both total mesorectal excision and preoperative chemoradiotherapy may adversely affect the anorectal function. Careful selection of the patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant therapy and identifying the patients with a high risk of developing functional problems may help to improve functional outcomes for the treatment of rectal cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
53
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After CRT+LE, Marks and colleagues reported good defecatory function in 13/14 patients and only 1/14 required a colostomy due to poor sphincter function [29]. Importantly, chemoradiotherapy treatment per se, in the absence of operative intervention, may adversely affect sphincter function [30]. Schell and colleagues have also reported the impact of low rectal cancer treatment on sphincter function [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…After CRT+LE, Marks and colleagues reported good defecatory function in 13/14 patients and only 1/14 required a colostomy due to poor sphincter function [29]. Importantly, chemoradiotherapy treatment per se, in the absence of operative intervention, may adversely affect sphincter function [30]. Schell and colleagues have also reported the impact of low rectal cancer treatment on sphincter function [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Impairment of the anal sphincter with preoperative radiochemotherapy has been an issue of concern (30). In low rectal cancer, sphincter-preserving surgery itself has some impact on anal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15). [27] 1994 Conventional 10 No 3 years Yes Gervaz et al [31] 2001 Conventional 45 Yes 2 years No Denhi et al [36] 2002 Conventional 28 Yes (Partially) 1 year No Nathanson et al [28] 2003 Conventional 109 No 5 years No Ammann et al [25] 2003 Conventional 28 Yes 1 year Yes Saito et al [29] 2004 Conventional 20 No 1 year Yes Pietsch et al [26] 2007 Conventional 12 No 6 months Yes Coco et al [37] 2007 Conventional 100 Yes 1 year No Canda et al [38] 2010 Conventional 31 Yes 1 year Yes Denost et al [39] 2011 Conventional 51 Yes 5 years No…”
Section: Management Of Radiation-related Functional Problemsmentioning
confidence: 97%