2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-006-0049-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of small-bodied fish on invertebrate prey and foraging patterns of waterbirds in Aspen Parkland wetlands

Abstract: Competition between large-bodied fish and waterbirds for aquatic invertebrates is well documented in oligotrophic lakes. Recent evidence suggests that small-bodied fish that colonize eutrophic, hypoxia-prone wetlands such as prairie potholes can also reduce aquatic invertebrates, but the effects of these reductions on breeding waterbirds have so far not been directly documented. We added brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) and fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) to a fishless wetland in Aspen Parkland potho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like fishes, spring populations of amphipods in wetlands are dependent upon overwinter survival of adults (Peterka, 1989;Arts et al, 1995;Lindeman & Clark, 1999;MacNeil et al, 1999). Alternatively, lower densities of fish may remove grazer competition for amphipods allowing amphipod densities to increase (Batzer, 1998;McParland & Paszkowski, 2006). In either case, our results indicate that once a threshold density of fathead minnows is reached a strong affect on amphipod densities can be observed, suggesting either strong competition or direct predation of amphipods by fathead minnows.…”
Section: Fishmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Like fishes, spring populations of amphipods in wetlands are dependent upon overwinter survival of adults (Peterka, 1989;Arts et al, 1995;Lindeman & Clark, 1999;MacNeil et al, 1999). Alternatively, lower densities of fish may remove grazer competition for amphipods allowing amphipod densities to increase (Batzer, 1998;McParland & Paszkowski, 2006). In either case, our results indicate that once a threshold density of fathead minnows is reached a strong affect on amphipod densities can be observed, suggesting either strong competition or direct predation of amphipods by fathead minnows.…”
Section: Fishmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…They speculated that fish predation might reduce foraging opportunities for migrating lesser scaup, but lacked empirical data comparing diets between lesser scaup and fishes. As fishes exert strong direct and indirect effects on invertebrate composition and abundance, they can have an important impact on prey availability in wetlands (Hanson & Riggs, 1995;Marklund et al 2002;McParland & Paszkowski, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in our study area, grisegena did not avoid ponds dominated by fish (contra Wagner and Hansson 1998) when the stocked carp was available as prey (Kloskowski 2012); although grebes were capable of preying on relatively large-bodied carp, on the ponds with plentiful fish insects formed a significant proportion of the diet (see also Onno 1960;Fjeldså 1982). Addition of fish, a large-sized and energetically highly profitable prey, to the ponds might help prelaying grebes to maximise their net energy gain (McParland and Paszkowski 2006). On the other hand, insects and amphibians migrating to the ponds can either be eliminated by fish predation or avoid oviposition in waterbodies containing fish, nontrophic effects playing an important role in the reduction of the alltochthonous subsidies (Vonesh et al 2009;Kloskowski 2011).…”
Section: Main Results and Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%