2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00863.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the feeding of wild Yeso sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) on the prevention of damage due to bark stripping and the use of feeding sites

Abstract: Feeding sites for wild Yeso sika deer around Lake Akan, Japan, were established. Effects on the number of deer using the feeding sites, the prevention of bark stripping damage, the amount of feeding, and eating time in a 5-year period (1999-2003) were evaluated. The number of deer using feeding sites increased with years during the feeding period. The damaged tree ratio after the initiation of feeding markedly decreased compared with 16.5% before the initiation of feeding. After the start of feeding, there wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies directly relating bark-stripping to natural food availability, however, are rare (Verheyden et al 2006, but see Ligot et al 2013). There are studies that have related level of bark-stripping to supplemental feeding (Ueckermann 1984, Jerina et al 2008, Masuko et al 2011, but a direct comparison between these studies and ours may be hampered because of differences between supplemental feeding and natural forage. Whereas supplemental feeding generally is concentrated at feeding stations and restricted to one or a few types of feed, natural forage can be expected to be more evenly spread in the landscape and probably consists of several species with differing availability, palatability and nutritional value (Putman and Staines 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies directly relating bark-stripping to natural food availability, however, are rare (Verheyden et al 2006, but see Ligot et al 2013). There are studies that have related level of bark-stripping to supplemental feeding (Ueckermann 1984, Jerina et al 2008, Masuko et al 2011, but a direct comparison between these studies and ours may be hampered because of differences between supplemental feeding and natural forage. Whereas supplemental feeding generally is concentrated at feeding stations and restricted to one or a few types of feed, natural forage can be expected to be more evenly spread in the landscape and probably consists of several species with differing availability, palatability and nutritional value (Putman and Staines 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, the damage that deer cause to agricultural, horticultural, and forest resources is an economic problem not only in Hokkaido (Masuko et al, 2011) but around the world (Trdan et al, 2003; Killian et al, 2009; Kimball et al, 2009; Baasch et al, 2010; Gheysen et al, 2011). Rather than eliminating deer, it is ideal to control their behavior so that they coexist with wild animals without destroying human habitats and natural environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Dahlan & Jiwan ; Shibata & Torazawa ; Masuko et al . ). In this situation, the damage to forest plantation species of Acacia mangium and Shorea macrophylla was examined and the damage caused on these two plantation species was minimal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most ungulate browsing studies focus on impacts on tree seedlings, debarking and saplings rather than general understory vegetation (Masuko et al . ; Randall & Walters ; Newson et al . ; Frerker et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%