2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2003.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the substitution positions of Br group in intercalative ligand on the DNA-binding behaviors of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the hydrophobic environment inside the DNA helix reduces the accessibility of solvent water molecules to the compound and the compound mobility is restricted at the certain binding sites, a decrease of the vibrational modes of relaxation results. The binding of the compounds to DNA leading to a significantly increase in emission intensity also agrees with those observed for other intercalators [40]. According to the Scatchard equation, a plot of r/C f versus r gave the binding constants (K b ) 2.39 Â 10 6 and 2.70 Â 10 5 M À1 from the fluorescence data for the Nd(III) complex and the free ligand, respectively.…”
Section: Fluorescence Spectrasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Since the hydrophobic environment inside the DNA helix reduces the accessibility of solvent water molecules to the compound and the compound mobility is restricted at the certain binding sites, a decrease of the vibrational modes of relaxation results. The binding of the compounds to DNA leading to a significantly increase in emission intensity also agrees with those observed for other intercalators [40]. According to the Scatchard equation, a plot of r/C f versus r gave the binding constants (K b ) 2.39 Â 10 6 and 2.70 Â 10 5 M À1 from the fluorescence data for the Nd(III) complex and the free ligand, respectively.…”
Section: Fluorescence Spectrasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Ligand p-mpip and complex precursors Δ-and Λ-[Ru(bpy) 2 (pyridine) 2 ][O,O′-dibenzoyl-D-tartrate]•12H 2 O were prepared according to the literature [9,3]. The two isomers [10] have been fully characterized by CD spectra, mass spectrometry, elemental analysis, NMR spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are comparable to that of complexes [Ru(phen) 2 (PBIP)] 2? (5.91 9 10 4 M -1 ) (Xu et al 2004) and [Ru(bpy) 2 PIP] 2? (4.7 ± 0.2 9 10 5 M -1 ) (Wu et al 1997), but smaller than that of complexes [Ru(bpy) 2 (dppz)] 2?…”
Section: Electronic Absorption Spectra Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%