2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-019-0528-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of three parameters on forming force of the single point incremental forming process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of the friction coefficient determined on the basis of Equation (1) would enhance the SPIF, the forming stability, and the formability [248,249].…”
Section: Determination Of Cofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase of the friction coefficient determined on the basis of Equation (1) would enhance the SPIF, the forming stability, and the formability [248,249].…”
Section: Determination Of Cofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second assumption was that the values of the friction coefficient vary along the drawpieces formed. The COF was calculated by the following relation [247]: The increase of the friction coefficient determined on the basis of Equation ( 1) would enhance the SPIF, the forming stability, and the formability [248,249].…”
Section: Determination Of Cofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the forming angle is reported to be a key factor to achieve good geometry accuracy of the SPIFed component. Studies show that the larger the forming angle, the smaller the forming force [19][20][21]. This is because the increase in angle can reduce the stiffness of the sheet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Materials with greater yield strength [18,19] also require greater force for the deformation to occur. However, as tool rotation increases [20], and with it the process temperature [21], there is a decrease in the required force. The feed rate on the other hand presents little influence over the forces applied to the ISF process [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%