2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of tidal cycles on shorebird distribution and foraging behaviour in a coastal tropical wetland: Insights for carrying capacity assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Western Sandpiper and Pacific Dunlin abundances were negatively correlated with tidal amplitude, consistent with previous studies linking shorebird abundance with tidal amplitude (Fonseca et al, 2017;Granadeiro et al, 2006;Nehls & Tiedemann, 1993), and indicating that fewer birds were observed during spring tides (wide tidal amplitude). Tides in this system are semi-diurnal (Thomson, 1981), and tidal amplitude is negatively correlated with the daily number of hours that the productive upper intertidal ).…”
Section: Tidal Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Western Sandpiper and Pacific Dunlin abundances were negatively correlated with tidal amplitude, consistent with previous studies linking shorebird abundance with tidal amplitude (Fonseca et al, 2017;Granadeiro et al, 2006;Nehls & Tiedemann, 1993), and indicating that fewer birds were observed during spring tides (wide tidal amplitude). Tides in this system are semi-diurnal (Thomson, 1981), and tidal amplitude is negatively correlated with the daily number of hours that the productive upper intertidal ).…”
Section: Tidal Amplitudesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This similar shorebird density contrasts with the pattern observed in the Estero de Urías, a smaller coastal wetland located south of BSM, where shorebird numbers over the entire wetland decreased sharply after the shrimp farm was harvested (Navedo et al 2015a). A possible explanation is that anthropogenic habitats can offer significant additional trophic resources for non-breeding shorebird populations where intertidal foraging areas are restricted (Basso et al 2018), thus temporally increasing current carrying capacity at small coastal wetlands such as Estero de Urías (Fonseca et al 2017). By contrast, at large bays such as BSM, most individuals use the natural intertidal areas as foraging grounds, but some fraction of the population of Nearctic shorebirds may shift to a different habitat/resource when it becomes available during the non-breeding season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the probability of dog harassment of shorebirds, we used the whimbrel as a model species. The whimbrel is a good model for this purpose because it is territorial in nonbreeding grounds [ 42 ], it is one of the most frequent shorebirds in the study area [ 38 ], and there is evidence that similar species are sensitive to disturbance caused by dogs and people (e.g., the Hudsonian godwit, Limosa haemastica [ 18 ]). During sampling, we recorded all whimbrels detected in the segments and if dogs were present there.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%