Effects of Tobacco Taxation and Pricing on Smoking Behavior in High Risk Populations: A Knowledge Synthesis

Abstract

Tobacco taxation is an essential component of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy. However, to fully realize the benefits it is vital to understand the impact of increased taxes among high-risk subpopulations. Are they influenced to the same extent as the general population? Do they need additional measures to influence smoking behavior? The objectives of this study were to synthesize the evidence regarding differential effects of taxation and price on smoking in: youth, young adults, persons of low socio-economic status, with dual diagnoses, heavy/long-term smokers, and Aboriginal people. Using a better practices approach, a knowledge synthesis was conducted using a systematic review of the literature and an expert advisory panel. Experts were involved in developing the study plan, discussing findings, developing policy recommendations, and identifying priorities for future research. Most studies found that raising cigarette prices through increased taxes is a highly effective measure for reducing smoking among youth, young adults, and persons of low socioeconomic status. However, there is a striking lack of evidence about the impact of increasing cigarette prices on smoking behavior in heavy/long-term smokers, persons with a dual diagnosis and Aboriginals. Given their high prevalence of smoking, urgent attention is needed to develop effective policies for the six subpopulations reviewed. These findings will be of value to policy-makers and researchers in their efforts to improve the effectiveness of tobacco control measures, especially with subpopulations at most risk. Although specific studies are needed, tobacco taxation is a key policy measure for driving success.

Association between smoking and alcohol‐related behaviours: a time–series analysis of population trends in England

“…However, it is also possible that unmeasured variables account for the change in both smoking and high‐risk drinking. Price increases applying at the same time to tobacco and alcohol may be one factor 53, 54. However, the price of cigarettes has increased linearly over time, so its impact would have been removed by differencing the time–series (that is, using the difference between successive values of the outcome variables rather than the values themselves) 34.…”

Disproportion in Taxation of Tobacco Products in the Czech Republic and Selected Neighbouring Countries

“…Zdanění tabákových výrobků je považováno za jednu z možných metod snížení jejich spotřeby, jak uvádí například Bader, Boisclair a Ferrence [2011]. S tímto obecným konsenzem polemizují např.…”

“…Callison a Kaestner [2012], když ve své práci poukazují na omezený vliv zvyšování daní na spotřebu cigaret. Relativně účinné však může být zdanění těchto výrobků v případě mladých lidí a obecněji skupin citlivějších na změnu ceny [Bader, Boisclair a Ferrence, 2011]. Zdražené výrobky se pro ně stávají hůře dostupnými a je tedy šance, že kouřit přestanou, nebo ani nezačnou.…”

Cigarette smoking in Austria – a call for action

“…In 2010, a 25% increase on excise duty was introduced and in 2016 the federal budget included a 12.5% increase per year; by 2020 the cost per pack of cigarettes will be 27. Higher costs are known to discourage cigarette purchases [8], particularly by lower socioeconomic classes, who are otherwise the most vulnerable sector of the community to heart disease. The tax increases are utilized to fund the health care costs of smoking-related diseases and as a bonus, price rises dramatically reduce smoking rates.…”