2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13245705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Ultrasonic Surface Rolling Processing and Subsequent Recovery Treatment on the Wear Resistance of AZ91D Mg Alloy

Abstract: AZ91D Mg alloy was treated by ultrasonic surface rolling processing (USRP) and subsequent recovery treatment at different temperatures. The dry sliding friction test was performed to investigate the effects of USRP and subsequent recovery treatment on the wear resistance of AZ91D Mg alloy by a ball-on-plate tribometer. The microstructure, properties of plastic deformation layer and worn morphology were observed by optical microscope (OM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plastic flow occurred on the surface of the USRP specimen under the action of multidirectional force during ultrasonic rolling; thus, the "peaks" on the material surface flowed into the "valleys," significantly reducing the mechanical defects (scratches) of the original specimen. The addition of lubricating oil on the surface of the sample further reduced the friction between the ball of the processing head and the surface of the sample, and thus the ultrasonic surface-rolling treatment significantly reduced the surface roughness of the sample [28]. Further reduction of surface roughness after ion implantation may have been due to sputtering, etching, and diffusion processes under this implantation dose.…”
Section: Surface Roughness and Microhardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastic flow occurred on the surface of the USRP specimen under the action of multidirectional force during ultrasonic rolling; thus, the "peaks" on the material surface flowed into the "valleys," significantly reducing the mechanical defects (scratches) of the original specimen. The addition of lubricating oil on the surface of the sample further reduced the friction between the ball of the processing head and the surface of the sample, and thus the ultrasonic surface-rolling treatment significantly reduced the surface roughness of the sample [28]. Further reduction of surface roughness after ion implantation may have been due to sputtering, etching, and diffusion processes under this implantation dose.…”
Section: Surface Roughness and Microhardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted that since AZ31 is a HCP structure, the number of slip systems is limited, and it is also the cause of limited plastic deformation; however, other deformation mechanisms, namely, twins, were activated, which contributed to grain refinement. Zhao et al [68] have explored USRP on AZ91D Mg alloy to improve the wear resistance. They had used a static load of 240 N at 20 kHz.…”
Section: Mg Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most rare earth metals have hexagonal close-packed (HCP) structure and fewer slip systems; therefore, the plastic deformation is very difficult because the rolling deformation process can easily cause stress concentration and lead to cracking [10,11]. There is a lot of research involving magnesium [12][13][14] and magnesium alloy [15,16], and titanium [17,18] and titanium alloy [19][20][21], but there are few studies on the deformation of rare earth metal. Huang P. [22] studied the effects of annealing temperatures on the hardness and microstructure of high-purity metal scandium metal after hot forging, and obtained the optimum annealing process of 725 • C × 0.5 h. Wang S. [23] studied the effect of annealing temperature on the microstructure of high-purity Er target under 80% deformation after hot rolling and obtained the optimum annealing process of 570 • C × 1 h. However, hot deformation process can easily lead to target oxidation, serious loss of raw materials, and worse surface quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%