1997
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.20.812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Various Absorption Enhancers on the Intestinal Absorption of Water Soluble Drugs by in Vitro Ussing Chamber Method: Correlation with an in Situ Absorption Experiment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we found some discrepancies between the result of the in vitro transport studies and the result of in situ absorption studies. These findings were not well correlated with previous study of Sugiyama et al (1997) who reported that there was a good correlation between the cumulative amount of phenol red absorbed (in vitro modified Ussing chamber method) and the area under the curve (AUC) obtained from the in situ closed loop model. 24) From these findings, we suggest that there appears to be some correlation between in vitro and in vivo studies in certain conditions and circumstances, however, it did not apply to all drugs or solubilizing agents used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, we found some discrepancies between the result of the in vitro transport studies and the result of in situ absorption studies. These findings were not well correlated with previous study of Sugiyama et al (1997) who reported that there was a good correlation between the cumulative amount of phenol red absorbed (in vitro modified Ussing chamber method) and the area under the curve (AUC) obtained from the in situ closed loop model. 24) From these findings, we suggest that there appears to be some correlation between in vitro and in vivo studies in certain conditions and circumstances, however, it did not apply to all drugs or solubilizing agents used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…C 10 increased the absorption of ebiratide [135], phenol red [102], and insulin [136] across rat colonic, but not jejunal epithelial mucosae (Table II). C 10 also increased paracellular permeability of a number of solutes in the colon but not in the small intestinal mucosae of rats and rabbits [137].…”
Section: [12] Intestinal Absorption Promotersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Isolated intestinal mucosa mounted in Ussing chambers permit comparison between effects of permeation enhancers on different regions of the intestine, thus TEER and flux changes similar to that seen in Caco-2 were noted in jejunal, ileal and colonic mucosae from a range of species upon exposure to C 10 . In tissue mucosae, C 10 decreased TEER with a concomitant increase in flux of poorly permeable markers including phenol red [102], poly-sucrose [103] and a range of FITC-dextrans [104] (Table II). While high concentrations of C 10 (>13mM) invariably lead to greater enhancement of fluxes of paracellular markers in Caco-2 monolayers and isolated intestinal mucosae (Table I and II), conclusions on mechanisms of action and of the presence cytotoxicity become rather irrelevant.…”
Section: [12] Intestinal Absorption Promotersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ preparations, where the artificially perfused organ remains attached to the systemic circulation, include the rat intestine, 1864,1951–1959 kidney,(1960) and liver. 19611969 The small intestine can be perfused in situ in humans, using stoppers to define a perfused segment.…”
Section: Disposition Of Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%