2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-015-2098-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of wall roughness on turbulent junction flow characteristics

Abstract: Global measurements of turbulent flows at wallcylinder junctions are employed to quantify the effects of wall roughness on the behavior of the horseshoe vortex system (HVS). Two laboratory setups were considered: one with an impermeable smooth wall and a second characterized by a porous hydraulically-rough bed. The measurements were obtained using planar Particle Image Velocimetry. Time-averaged flow topology, turbulence statistics, and instantaneous fields associated with the streamwise and wall-normal veloci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blockage (i.e. flume width to diameter) ratio in the present experiment is 6.25, which is near the lower limit of the acceptable range indicated by referencing previous relevant studies [7,13,16]. The origin of the coordinate system is defined as the center of the cylinder on its bottom surface, with the longitudinal x-axis parallel to the flume bed and oriented with the main flow, the y-axis vertical, and with the z-axis normal to the side wall of the flume.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The blockage (i.e. flume width to diameter) ratio in the present experiment is 6.25, which is near the lower limit of the acceptable range indicated by referencing previous relevant studies [7,13,16]. The origin of the coordinate system is defined as the center of the cylinder on its bottom surface, with the longitudinal x-axis parallel to the flume bed and oriented with the main flow, the y-axis vertical, and with the z-axis normal to the side wall of the flume.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A number of related studies of THV have focused on the time-averaged geometrical characteristics [5][6][7][8], the dynamics of THV utilizing particle image velocimetry (PIV) [9][10][11][12][13][14], eddy-resolving large eddy simulation (LES) [15][16][17], or detached eddy simulation (DES) [18]. These studies mainly focus on the flow field induced by the THV, however, little literature reports on the relevant influence and relationship of the THV on sediment transport and erosion, which is essential to identify the mechanisms of pier scour and to further improve the prediction accuracy of scour depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The groove has also been observed in [39,40] and it has been attributed to the existence of a corner vortex that is located at the intersection of the bed with the cylinder and rotates in the opposite (counterclockwise) direction compared to the primary horseshoe vortex [41].…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The sediment bed was set up on the bottom with median diameter d 50 = 0.6 mm and specific mass ρ s = 2650 kg/m 3 . The blockage ratio (i.e., flume width to pier diameter) in the present test is 6.25, which is in the proposed acceptable range [12,28,29]. The origin of the coordinate system is defined at the bottom center of the cylinder, with the longitudinal x-axis parallel to the flume bed, the y-axis normal to the side wall of the flume, and the z-axis vertical to the flume bottom.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 80%