2020
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of silicone soft reliner on the obturator prosthesis after maxillectomy for oral malignant tumors: A single‐arm prospective interventional study

Abstract: Background There is insufficient evidence for the efficacy of silicone soft reliner on the obturator prosthesis after maxillectomy for oral malignant tumors. Objective To verify the efficacy of silicone soft reliner on the obturator prosthesis after maxillectomy, by evaluating masticatory performance and quality of life (QoL). Methods This was a single‐arm prospective interventional study, verifying the efficacy of silicone soft reliner (GC RELINE II®) on the maxillary obturator prosthesis. Data were obtained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The masticatory performance was evaluated after the insertion of the new obturator by measuring glucose extraction while masticating a piece of gummy jelly (Glucorumn; GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) [16]. Considering the larger size of the defect in the present case, the patient's masticatory efficiency (106.6 mg/dL) was comparable to the results of a previous study that reported a masticatory efficiency of 99.6 mg/dL (59.0-124.0) for an acrylic resin obturator and 126.0 mg/dL (118.0-142.0) for a soft-liner obturator in patients who underwent partial maxillectomy [17].…”
Section: Effect Of Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The masticatory performance was evaluated after the insertion of the new obturator by measuring glucose extraction while masticating a piece of gummy jelly (Glucorumn; GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) [16]. Considering the larger size of the defect in the present case, the patient's masticatory efficiency (106.6 mg/dL) was comparable to the results of a previous study that reported a masticatory efficiency of 99.6 mg/dL (59.0-124.0) for an acrylic resin obturator and 126.0 mg/dL (118.0-142.0) for a soft-liner obturator in patients who underwent partial maxillectomy [17].…”
Section: Effect Of Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[ 9 ] For furthermore retention in extensive defects, relining of the obturator using a soft temporary reliner (tissue conditioner), which also avoids injury or pain due to direct contact of hard acrylic resin with mucosal tissues was done. [ 10 ]…”
Section: Immediate and Interim Obturatormentioning
confidence: 99%