1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(96)00319-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of various collection methods for oocyte retrieval in buffalo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
43
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
43
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were in agreement with that reported by Das et al, 1996 andSamad et al, 1998, who reported mean recovery rates of 1.7 and 1.76 respectively in buffaloes. However, higher oocyte recovery rates 2.2, 2.65 and 3.12 in buffaloes were reported by Tasripoo and Kamonpatana (1997), Shahid et al, (2014) and Ruhil and Purohit (2016) respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were in agreement with that reported by Das et al, 1996 andSamad et al, 1998, who reported mean recovery rates of 1.7 and 1.76 respectively in buffaloes. However, higher oocyte recovery rates 2.2, 2.65 and 3.12 in buffaloes were reported by Tasripoo and Kamonpatana (1997), Shahid et al, (2014) and Ruhil and Purohit (2016) respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The mean oocyte recovery rate obtained from the ovaries with CL (1.35) was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower than that obtained from the ovaries without CL (1.97). Similar trend was reported by Das et al, (1996) and Raza et al, (2001) recorded that the presence of a CL significantly reduces the number of ovarian follicles as well as the quality of oocytes in buffaloes. This is because follicular development is restricted, as lutein cells occupy most of the ovary (Kumar et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The Egyptian buffalo possesses a greater number of good quality oocytes (1.4 oocytes/ovary). Our results were higher than previously recorded in the Indian buffalo [13,15] and this difference may be due to the variation in breed. The low reproductive capacity of the buffalo in terms of the total number of follicles per ovary, the high percentage of atretic follicles and the low rate of oocyte recovery could be attributed as a whole to the low average number of primordial follicles per ovary when compared with cattle [14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…A small number of authors have reported on the in vitro maturation and fertilization of buffalo oocytes [2,5,13,15]. In this study, the cleavage rate and yield of blastocysts of in vitro fertilized Egyptian buffalo oocytes, using CR1aa medium for IVM, IVF and IVC, were 81% and 40.2% when coincubated with spermatozoa from Bull 2, which has 60% motile sperm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Other records found that the stage of oestrous cycle has no effect on bovine oocytes quality or its developmental potentials [14]. Moreover, the number of follicles and yield of oocytes per ovary were less from buffalo ovaries bearing a CL [3,13]. In addition, methods of oocyte retrieval are directly affecting the yield and quality of oocytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%