2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of chlorophyll in gross primary productivity: A proof of concept and application in crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when canopy Chl was above 2 g·m −2 , the decline of canopy Chl minimally affected absorbed radiation, and canopy reflectance was virtually invariant in the PAR and shortwave red edge regions [61]. This was due to the low transmittance of the canopy and the shortened path length of light inside the canopy [61,63]. When canopy Chl dropped below 1.5 g·m −2 , the difference in reflectance between the two stages became increasingly significant, for the whole PAR range in maize ( Figure 1A-C) and the blue and red regions in soybean (Figure 2A,C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, when canopy Chl was above 2 g·m −2 , the decline of canopy Chl minimally affected absorbed radiation, and canopy reflectance was virtually invariant in the PAR and shortwave red edge regions [61]. This was due to the low transmittance of the canopy and the shortened path length of light inside the canopy [61,63]. When canopy Chl dropped below 1.5 g·m −2 , the difference in reflectance between the two stages became increasingly significant, for the whole PAR range in maize ( Figure 1A-C) and the blue and red regions in soybean (Figure 2A,C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of "illuminated chlorophyll" related to absorbed PAR became higher, and the whole canopy worked efficiently to absorb incident light [64]. Because of increasing chlorophyll efficiency [63], absorbed radiation was still substantial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assumed that the percentage of active chlorophyll would be higher in the grass-like group. Recently, Gitelson et al 2016 introduced the concept of chlorophyll efficiency, defined as the GPP per incident PAR per chlorophyll content per unit area. This was determined by studying crops with different canopy structures, that is, maize, which is open to incident light, and soybean, which is more closed.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Gitelson et al 2016 treated the two types of crop with different canopy structures and leaf angles differently, grass-like areas were also open to incident light, and deciduous woody plant areas were more closed to light penetration. There may be other factors that affect the differences in the slopes of the two groups, but we believe that the difference in exposure to sunlight is the main reason for the difference.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%