1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01641-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
547
0
9

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 796 publications
(565 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
547
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As we do not expect wages and capital to be strictly exogenous in our employment application, we focus here on moment conditions of the type E(u GR y G R\ )"0 and E(u GR x G R\ )"0. Stricter exogeneity restrictions on the x GR would allow the use of further instruments, as detailed in Arellano and Bond (1991), Ahn and Schmidt (1995) and Arellano and Bover (1995). For the same reason we do not consider conditional GLS results here.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we do not expect wages and capital to be strictly exogenous in our employment application, we focus here on moment conditions of the type E(u GR y G R\ )"0 and E(u GR x G R\ )"0. Stricter exogeneity restrictions on the x GR would allow the use of further instruments, as detailed in Arellano and Bond (1991), Ahn and Schmidt (1995) and Arellano and Bover (1995). For the same reason we do not consider conditional GLS results here.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which shows that Var (-?= Yl'i=-i 13^=1 (^®^o"io)^0~''(^)-^^^t herefore follows that (15) is Op (1) Lemma 3 Let ya he generated by (1 The last line of the display follows by Cesaro summability and stationarity. The second part of the theorem follows from Lemma (4) which implies that /C(ii,f2) = for all ii and i2-…”
Section: =1mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To describe the intuition behind this result, we consider the AR(1) 12 The reason why we consider the GMM estimator using z it (1) as instruments is that, in terms of MAE, the GMM estimator may perform better than the IV estimator since the GMM estimator is more efficient than the IV estimator under large N and fixed T asymptotics. Also, the reason why we choose = 1 is that the IV estimator with = 1 performs best as will be shown.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, since the IV estimator is not generally efficient, Holtz-Eakin, Newey, and Rosen (1988) and Arellano and Bond (1991) proposed to use the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator to improve efficiency. The GMM estimator has subsequently been refined in a number of studies, including Arellano and Bover (1995), Schmidt (1995, 1997) and Blundell and Bond (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%