2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient estimation of the functional reliability of a passive system by means of an improved Line Sampling method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5) Calculate the failure probability of the ith sample P fi , then the failure probability estimator b P f and its variance estimator r 2 ð b P f Þ of N samples in failure margin are obtained in Eqs. (13), (14).…”
Section: Improved Line Sampling For Truncated Random Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(5) Calculate the failure probability of the ith sample P fi , then the failure probability estimator b P f and its variance estimator r 2 ð b P f Þ of N samples in failure margin are obtained in Eqs. (13), (14).…”
Section: Improved Line Sampling For Truncated Random Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…13 The underlying idea of line sampling is to employ lines instead of the random points to probe the failure domain of the reliability system. 14,15 In aerospace engineering, reliability problem is a typically highly reliable, nonlinear problem. How to use the truncated probability information in aerospace mechanism to run line sampling to obtain reliability is an important research issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-dimensional problems are solved along an "important direction" that optimally points towards the failure domain, in place of the high-dimensional problem [65]. The approach overcomes standard MCS in a wide range of engineering applications [22,39,51,65,[68][69][70][71] and allows ideally reducing to zero the variance of the failure probability estimator if the "important direction" is perpendicular to the almost linear boundaries of the failure domain [64].…”
Section: Advanced Monte Carlo Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, advanced Monte Carlo Simulation methods can be adopted to realize robust estimations by means of a limited amount of random samples [62][63][64] . This class of methods includes Stratified Sampling [65,66] , Subset Simulation (SS) [67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] , the Response Conditioning Method (RCM) [75,76] for structural reliability analysis (also developed from SS and employing approximate solutions), Line Sampling (LS) [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84] and splitting methods [85][86][87][88][89] . However, the advanced MCS methods that is adopted more frequently is perhaps Importance Sampling (IS), where the original PDF of the uncertain inputs is replaced by a proper Importance Sampling Density (ISD): this favors the MC samples to lie close to the failure region, thus artificially increasing the frequency of the (rare) failure event [90][91][92] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• in Ref. [100] , the focus of the comparisons between AM-SIS and other MC schemes (in particular, standard MCS, LHS [65] , IS [90][91][92][93][94] and LS [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84] ) is exclusively put on the efficiency of stage (2) of the algorithm, i.e., of random importance sampling for failure probability estimation. In this work, instead, comparisons are made also to other methods that combine SS and metamodels and that are very close to stage (1) of our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%