2016
DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2016.3.700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Opinion Summarization on Comments with Online-LDA

Abstract: Customer reviews and comments on web pages are important information in our daily life. For example, we prefer to choose a hotel with positive comments from previous customers. As the huge amounts of such information demonstrate the characteristics of big data, it places heavy burdens on the assimilation of the customercontributed opinions. To overcoming this problem, we study an efficient opinion summarization approach for a set of massive user reviews and comments associated with an online resource, to summa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire (given in Table 3) was previously tested with a small group of firms, subsequently revised and re-tested, and, finally, sent to all the local firms, with the support of local associations (hotel and ski pass). We used a 5-point Likert-type scale, which was later reduced to 3 points (see Table 3), in order to simplify the outputs into a negative, neutral, and positive evaluation, as used in some previous studies (e.g., Ma, Luo, Yao, Cheng, & Chen, 2016). A total of 124 completed and usable questionnaires were collected that represent all the analyzed sectors (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire (given in Table 3) was previously tested with a small group of firms, subsequently revised and re-tested, and, finally, sent to all the local firms, with the support of local associations (hotel and ski pass). We used a 5-point Likert-type scale, which was later reduced to 3 points (see Table 3), in order to simplify the outputs into a negative, neutral, and positive evaluation, as used in some previous studies (e.g., Ma, Luo, Yao, Cheng, & Chen, 2016). A total of 124 completed and usable questionnaires were collected that represent all the analyzed sectors (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%